Search results

monkey: factors of production being land, labour, capital and enterprise the easiest to explain is labour we have unemployment, and thus there are resources(ppls work) being wasted land - well if theres unused land our production possibility curve isnt at the most outer possibility and same...

*quickly runs off to learn piano, learn how to sing and build cars*

also, minor abberatoins to inflation (nick, its on!) hehe

yes and no, higher IR will appreciate our dollar, which lowers international competitiveness and increases imports, decreasing exports, blowing up our CAD

sustianable eco growth low inflation low unemployment esd full employment of fops income equality bitteschon!

labour market dereg, financial market dereg(although may be a bit old), its pretty much anything thats not macro!

someones been lookin at the past papers!

heh, my friend that got a co-op got 65.7 for his first semester, he was shittin his pants about not making the required cred avg

mummy's tagging along with me, i dont see what the problem is 1/4..wow that aint bad

in my christmas holidays i wrote notes out for topic 1 of phys and chem, and got my aos stuff for english under wraps its about 5-6 weeks of holidays, 1-2 hours, 3-4 times in a week doesnt hurt

example i just did, if u do neutron bombardment on a u-238 u get this (238 92)U + (1 0)n --> (239 92)U --> (239 93)Np + (0 -1)e [i think its neptunium, cant relally remember] for commercial i talked about technitium99m and americium 241

yeh its criteria marking, if you dont have what they want, its marked as wrong, even if you show extensive knowledge

im EXTREMELY outgoing......smart..? that can be debateable :)

for the neutron bombardment it cant be too high of a speed otherwise it just smashes the atom (a la physics course) it needs to be slow moving so it absorbs it, then its Neutron:Proton ratio will be outside the zone of stability and undergo beta decay which raises atomic number by 1

itll be on board of studies site

8 for chem of art WHERES ALL THE CHEM OF ART PPPL!!!!

i think i can get anywhere from 85-95 raw, you can never know my school assess mark of 75 doesnt really help my band6 aspirations though

did all that ethanol crap also put stuff about biopolymers just to be sure, gaev for/against, what with biodegradbility etc vs high cost and stuff

im glad they didnt test the: battery stuff(redox equations were complicated and hard to remeber) tests of water quality and stuff stuff on a named scientist reasons for/against scientists about collaboration or something like that htats all for now feel free to add to the list

although BaOH + HNO3 ----> BaNO3 + H20 is balanced, BaOH isnt corrrect as Ba is 2+ and OH is 1- therefore what i believe is correct is Ba(OH)2 + 2HNO3 ----> BaNO3 + 2H20 so that kinda complicated things just a lil when using the equation (CaVa)/S = (CbVb)/B