Search results

Yer I usually have one on my way to my exams...can't wake up without them...

Got Modern History and History Extension left... blah!

Included all that in my essay too.. but I didn't do depreciation graphs because they're basically the opposite to appreciation ... waste of time. :) Went into the exam thinking I would fuck it up.. but from what you guys are saying it seems to be pretty alright..

I included all that.. hope I did well though. But some people I know actually talked about the syllabus points under the two issues, i.e. causes of inflation and stuff. But I didn't do that I talked about the policies and how effective they were in influencing those issues (which I thought...

19/20.. made the most stupid bloody mistake on question 13... it really pisses me off when I find something that I got wrong which I should've got right... *grumbles*

I did Q25 and Q27.. never done a globalisation one before...

Was great all round really... just didn't study enough but hope I get band 6 anyway..

Got 19/20 I think.. w00t! :) Fucken misread one of the questions....

Yer.. I think I did way better in asessments than HSC... economics is gonna be shit tomorrow. Because i'm 1st rank in economics, is it as simple as me getting given the same mark as the person who comes 1st in HSC? Or is it more difficult.. hehe *fingers crossed*

Is that good or bad? Also, you know how assessments/HSC take up 50/50. Is it better to get awesome assessment rankings and do not as well in the HSC, or the opposite? Or is it the same thing...

Three main areas of external stability are: CAD Net foreign debt Exchange rates Here's a very brief explanation of each: CAD - Increased CAD as people are importing more. Net foreign debt - Government/private sector borrowing from overseas to finance its own debt --> increased...

1. More money to education and health in the fiscal policy. 2. Micro-economic reform to labour market - deregulation - improve competitiveness of labour/quality of life. 3. Trade policy - enter into FTAs with other countries in order to increase the variety/quality of goods, decrease prices...

LOL @ Passion pop....chick drink to the max * 10 + 1 I finish on the 5th of Nov...damn hist ext.

OMG - you must be cheering! No more school for you....

WTF Andrew.. don't u do extension 2?

Simple multiplier is 1/MPS. So in this case it would be 1/0.2Y, which is 5. This means an increase in aggregate demand by $100 (just as an example) will result in $500 extra income generated in the economy. Pretty sure that's how it works...haven't done much study for eco yet (i'm a crammer!) :)

It's 700. Equilibrium level of income is when S = I. So they give you the consumption function and you have to first work out the savings function, which is the inverse. So: S = -100 + 0.2Y Sub in I = 40 40 = -100 + 0.2Y 140 = 0.2Y Y = 700

I think dreami's explanation fits the bill too.... it can be related to any situation that forces a budget deficit and a CAD..

It's samuel l. jackson you uncultured swine :)

No tan theta was angle ABO. You had to go 90-theta to get the angle between the line AB and L. However, since it was 45 anyway that didn't matter, which would've been lucky for some people.