Search results

i think the author didnt try to convey the idea that all commerce/law/dent graduates are in there because the course is more 'pragmatic' in terms of career options...rather that the numbers are disproportionately high. So while I agree that she fails to acknowledge those who truly do have a...

i know that...what i meant was that its hardly enough to practice off, hence listing the three realistic oprions...something that Lexicographer over there might like to keep in mind :)

yep i moved my tutorial i wrote up for section three last year but as for section one...as with any other thing the tip is to get your hands on practice questions and just work your ass off... its kinda difficult as ACER doesnt release past or practice papers...so you have several options...

well theres no majors in medicine as such...but hoping to specialise in general surgery, opthalmology or nephrology

i've edited this thread to include international admissions also so be sure to check out the link on the first page people

oh yes it does...and anyway i wasnt't insinuating anything about you or the other vet students out there so chillax

my preferences were med at UNSW, UNCLE, Monash, Melbourne, UWA in that order I thought that if I didn't get into at least one of those I would do BEng(Mech.Biomed) at USyd under the advanced engineering stream, followed by BSci(Adv) at USyd or UNSW and then forgot the rest of my UAC preferences...

s/he wasnt waking an assumption,.....as evidenced by "if any"

rofflemayo nanoscience at UTS lollercoaster

my favourite would have to be davies...becauseits easy to understand and tells you what you need to know...but it could be a bit simple at times thats why i borrowed guyton to pore over before the exams...

Monash has 2 (two) PCL sessions a week...one on Monday lasting for an hour just to raise some preliminary questions (refer to Part A) and one two hour tutorial on Friday (all other parts). Basically the case is presented on Monday and we don't get into the theory side of things too much. The...

sorry i got confused there...its not AF as I suggested but actually VF...there is no identifiable pacemaker rhythm (possibly caused by establishment of many re-entrant circuits)...i just brushed up my cardiology today (good ol' Guyton lolz)

good stuff med students! to those that troll around on the forums...we know who you are! if you have some useful information to contribute feel free to contribute and don't just leech off other peoples' experience

that must be one of the smartest insights I have heard on this forum for ages....remember this principle kids!

don't ask me- i'm just a med student! if you want clinical evidence ask any tutor or doctor

the link to an example PCL is here: http://www.sendmefile.com/00006064

1) Alvin is right (shock horror!) in that it is actually PCL. I can't tell you exactly how that differs from PBL since I haven't done those but at a fundamental level they are quite similar. What a PCL involves is reading through a "Patient Centred Case" on Monday- which, as the name suggests...

i can see that you really dont belive this is an AF...and this argument is going nowhere so lets just agree to disagree aye? My evidence is one hundred years of clinical practice... I know that's not a real ECG but just imagine an imaginary grid drawn over it...

i will find evidence for you that it is AF... in response to your question there are three types of heart block and they are dependent on the ECG demonstrating at least some kind of sinus rhythm...you can't see any heart block here as there is no intrinsic rhythm

yeah there must be something about it- i just cant figure it out :p