Search results

I would personally like to see UNSW include a compulsory stand-alone equity course. Though we do the relevant areas in contracts, property, etc -- I agree it would be beneficial to have a complete course for it. That said, there are many elective subjects that cover equitable remedies and...

Age: 21 Job: Barrister (Senior Counsel) Wage: $1000 p/hr Hours: 12 p/day well... not yet. For now: Myer -- $17.50-$25 p/hr

I agree, Turnbull is clever but he is also quite a good conversationalist/interview speaker and can articulate ideas well. He has also not been afraid to be critical of elements of government policy and has thrown a few fresh ideas into the arena -- I appreciate those things and I think that the...

I did the "write-a-judgment" question :P Mmm... really forces you to do the reading

haha Janet is rumoured to be a shrewd contributor behind the scenes, but I'm pretty sure she can find another property equally redeeming.

I'm big on art but most of those kind of abstract/junk sculptures are pieces of junk. Generally they require no skill or creativity, communicate no feeling, have no beauty and convey no meaning or purpose of any substance.

Either Howard will be foolish and try another term - in which case Costello will challenge. This is very unlikely. Or Howard packs it in and hands it over to Costello, probably sometime early to mid 2006 (they would want to give Costello at least a year to make an impression). Costello is...

No, proper essays (Exam essays are pretty much extended responses though, as you don't have time to make a flowerly intro, etc.)

There are not any in-class essays except for in the final exam. As for hand-writing in the final exam, no you are not permitted to use a computer.

Typically, the assessment structure will involve: 1. Class participation (~10%) 2. An essay or mis-session test (~30%) 3. Final exam (60%) but sometimes it might be: 1. Class participation (~20%) 2. Final exam (80%) For most law subjects, you will have a final exam that consists...

But the number is relevant - 4 people, however unanimous, bring less knowledge, experience, sense and diversity of views to operate on the situation.

Yes, and this magic number of 12 has been apparently plucked from the air and revered as a truism ever since

(I have not actually had a chance to look at the amendments so I personally cannot confirm this)

Yes, exactly

Personally I would like to know where the number 12 came from. There doesn't appear to be any direct reason or logic behind that particular number of jurors.

I have no qualms with the discussion, Generator

Coke returns from the dead!

Oh right. So everyone who is ever charged with anything is a criminal? The trial is the test. If they haven't undergone the trial, they are not a criminal.

Dammit I would loved to have seen that! I shall have to settle for the transcript :( Fraser is such a bully - the way he answers questions.. heheh

Um, they are not a criminal until they are convicted.