Search results

uai required = 86 programs avail = all, except for electrical, computer, software, ecommerce, telco..... How it works? U try out the flexible first year and at the end u go into specialisations of your choice...and you are guaranteed to get in so long as your previous years UAI is greater...

why does CSI not rate any mention? It's the only thing on tellie I watch, beside the news of course//.... Can't wait for Miami to come out tho :P

yes it is harder than getting a 99 uai...cos to transfer i would say u need a distinction average...i think there was another thread which was discussing this...how some ppl were brilliant at school and did meagrely in their GPA's... so yeh whle it is theoretically possible, you're best bet...

hey jayz do u go to caringbah? anyhows yeh aeroutical engineering is fixing up planes and dat kinda stuff....altho if ur realli ambitious try out for aerspace...now thats hardcore...u can get employed by NASA and fix up their spacecraft:P

dont get influenced by shows like csi and the like...i was also cinseidering doing it but i head from many professionals that there are not many job oppurtunities available in australia

unsw has aeronautical but its like a major within the mechanical engineering so at he end of your 4 years u end up with BE(Mech.)...whereas at Sydney they have BE (Aeronautical), which is the engineering of Planes (91.3 UAI if i remeber correctly), or the BE(Aeronautical)(Space) which is bloody...

errr halo...i think not...the all or nothing principle is that you can't simply reduce the input voltage by a tiny notch and expect the current rate to drop proportionally(refer to the above post)...get it right

Anybody doing either of these of both degrees combined? What are your impressions and what advice would you give in regards to the course?

as always john is trying to confuse us with his big words...so I shall restate concisely... Fist point: YES you would expect "the rate of emitted electrons to go down as you RETARD them"...BUT, that's only according to the classical definition of physics, which has continuous energies...the...

oops sorry i forgot to remind you there textbook :P but anyways i don't think you woudl have had much success anyways...as I said it's bloody impossible~~

a big shoutout to our friend TEXTBOOK for being such a help and frequentung this forum...hehe you know who u are ;)

Did anyone do it....how #@%#!$ impossible was it!! I hope you all agree with me here...cos if u guys didn't I would feel extremely dumb....HEck!! I feel dumb anyway!!

yes i agree with john there....in the theory of classical physics the energy of the electrons would have been able to increase indefinitely meaning that there was an apparent problem...the trend seemed to suggest that the total energy would have no bound which of course we know is not true (also...

oooops Chudy you're right..... ^^;; The yellow guy's name is "Odlaw"- other characters include a nerdy girl (Wenda) and a nerdy dog (Woof):D

http://uk.geocities.com/wheres_wa11y/whereswally.jpg have a look here and you 'll get the gist of it....anyhows chudy...i thought that Waldo wsas the evil yellow guy! Or is he? My memory may be eluding me.....

man u have definitely been deprived of a proper childhood and I lament that loss....how can you not know "Where's Wally"....?!?! When I was a kid, it was the sole reason for living! Its a book with huge pictures and you have to find a particular character called wally (and his evil nemesis...

i appreciate that John has cool ideas...but he's phrased them in a very bullshit way so as to confuse himself, and you in the process....

yes thats correctexcept it wouldbe more technically correct if you dont assume the thing youre trying to prove to start off with...thats to say, write the whole thing backwards and bobs your uncle

yeh probly...unless something weird happens

hey whats new