Search results

exactly, if you put down what you needed to say, why worry bout how many pages. Unless it was something ridiculous like 2 or 3 where you could not possibly have answered the question in detail, everyone knows personally how much they need to write. Some are more succint than others...

don't talk in terms of pages talk in terms af words, page numbers can be very deceptive...

No arguments, just tell us what you think. I put c, my teacher has said it was d, which kinda makes more sense now since it was a dispute to resolve instead of address. Just want to know what everyone else put...

hehe so what like the whol exam? :p Nah I thought it was alright, I don't think I ripped it which was disapointing, but we'll see what tehy do scaling-wise

If this isn't a lie I would be really worried about the quality of your teacher....this question is very simple and it is very worrying if your teacher picked c.

Guys tha answer is b. There is no arguing this one, arguably the easiest question on the paper. The answer is NOT native title. Native title is something invented by the common law. Dispute resolution is the basis of customary law, the primary aim being to resolve disputes and return to a...

I don't really care what all of you say, your mark has no bearing on my life. What Im saying is this exam was months in the making and they aren't going to include a question that disadvantages those who didn't do consumers. I don't see how it doesn't make sense sugamama.

I didn't think it was too bad, freaked at first but when I stopped and thought, it turned out ok.

It doesn't matter if the harm actually occurs or not, the potential was there. I know you think contract cos you're studying law, what Im saying is you have to look at the key terms of the question and relate it to the syllabus, which points undeniably to tort. If it was contract they are...

I put c for question 9 but teacher said it was d, cos they are addressing problems with a law not making a whole new one

A civil wrong is an act or omission which harms an individual. In this case it was an omission (failure of quality control) that may have led to harm (I spose it could have been an act, they couldve been put in there deliberately). It was tort. The reason all you people are saying contract is...

Legal measures, I put extradition or dealing with it through the domestic law. It said legal measures in dealing with international crime, not international legal measures.

Where all you guys are going to go wrong is thinking too deeply. A tort in the syllabus is referred to as a civil wrong. The answer is tort.

:rolleyes:

That would be wonderful, but hopes are fading with all this talk of cutoffs jumping up....

Well obviously if someone writes 'Crimes Act 1903' they are wrong. But I don't think they are too concerned with dates anyway. I mean if they are way off, yes, but they want to know that you know the acts, not the symantics of it all

Hopefully Im not, but they could pull some whoppers so I guess I'll tell you come December 19

I was told by a senior marker that they don't, cos it wastes too much time.

this syllabus is quite reasonable compared to the history ones....

its not a call its the truth