Search results

my guess is that money exchanged pockets in the dressing rooms...

Ditto Hewitt, 2001. 7-6, 6-1, 6-1. :uhhuh:

..money and publicity.

Why's that?

Davenport was injured and also sick.

I'm thinking three days off for safin will put him out of rhythm - at least for the first set anyway. Expect hewitt to win the first set.....then win the match in 4. I don't think he has the patience to beat him. Is shouting out 'CMON' unsportsmanlike? Please explain...

Amoz, oh amoz..

They're pretty mad. I went and saw'em the other week with 28 days.

We are being relied upon to continue the chain of civilisation.. Inevitably this chain will one day end. My guess is next saturday.

No, Venus got knocked out, and lindsay hasn't played her semi yet.

Oh right, yeh - 3rd plays 2nd not 1st. Federer/safin will be quite a match..

Yeh, I got 96 and didn't make it either.

That can't happen - if you check the draw you'd see hewitt as 3rd seed, and Federer as 1. This means they can only meet in the semis. The supposed winner would meet roddicks half of the draw.

...which still isn't much. Fines won't do much to the player unless it's in excess of 50% (depending on the offence)

This is where the argument about equal tournament winnings gets interwoven. Personally, I support the traditional view.

LOL i'll rep you for that!

Yeh, lol. I've been posting before about Safin's somewhat fragile mental game, but i think that fines should either be on a sliding scale (based on tournament winnings) or non-existent. Instead perhaps match bans or torture by lashings. :gridnod:

that would be fantastic!

..but sometimes there's the small things that count :p

Yes, i was going to add that - he has improved alot since his younger days and certainly could win it. He's no doubt one of the strongest players out there! Yeh they should at least show one of the junior finals..