Search results

i think there will be some pretty difficult calculation questions, like the one with gravitational potential energy in the 2006 paper

i under the suff about valence band and enerygy gap and how to explain its resistance. but what exactly is conduction band? and how do we relate the idea of conduction band and valence band to p type and n type semiconductor? i know that it reduce the gap between valence and conduction band...

i used jarcaranda. its very detailed i think the space and motor and generator parts of the book is brilliant. the problem with this book i think is that in contain too much information.

i think its d. low income inequality is not always the case, it depends on government policies very much.. if u look at economic data, china n india both have higher gini coefficient than the us. whereas they have over 70 per cent of the labour force employed in agriculture sectors.

i disagree. if the economy is at its natural rate of unemployment, the economy must be growing pretty strongly. therefore there must be a consistent trend of increasing participation rate.. Expansionary policy would even encourage more people to join the labour force. and dont be so cynical..

when i was doing the question i thought the question must be wrong. this question is soooooooo odd, never seen anything like this. coz from my knownlege, unemplomeny can noy be lower than natural unemployment rate. so i just put A. and then i had a thought after the exam? is that very likely...

no, i found its relatively easy, the first few parts of q7e is quite do-able.

q7 e,especially the first few marks,i will say its relatively easy, must better than 03 n 04s' overall i think the paper is moderate in difficulty comparing with those ones in the early 2000s.

i think they will be on environmental issues and distribution of income which i hate a lot. i hope it will be something like macro or micro policies or inflation, unemployment ,etc

Re: What did you think? i think its the speed of the current? cos it looks like a exponential growth n decay question

i dont think its harder than the 2000 one, but obviously a lot harder than 2007 and 2006

i did really badly, got somethin like 75. 105, i think uve done extremely well..

yeah, the second last question of q1 was pretty difficult and the conics one was really hard too. hardesr since 1990s , seriously?

I did quite badly, spent too much time on q5 n q6. I estimated i would get a raw mark of something like, 75/120. did anyone find it difficult?

i agree, really cant do any maths this week. hope the actual paper is gonna be easy.

i will probably be able to answer this question after the hsc.

I have no freaking idea about q7 n q8. i could only get 4 marks for the entire two questions.. damn.

yea, i could only work out part i without looking at the solution. it takes really long and the algebra is so hefty. i think 2005 q8 b, the hyperbola question is really tough as well..

good. thanks so much..

i think there is absolutly on doubt. it must be 2000. its insane, q5 involves a non-uniform circular motion question. for q7 ang q8, i can only get like 4 marks..