Search results

and hey, whoever it was that was bitching about the mark, if you go to selective school, you can just hope that everyone else gets like 90, and you all get scaled up. that's what i'm relying on: the work of my fellow classmates ;)

yeah i got 10 :( bah.... isomers/allatropes.... who knows what they are? anyone with 5 braincells, that's who!!! how could i forget??

*HUG*..........

sounds good to me. mostly cos i said something like that too, and i like being reassured

it's a talent i hope to fall back on often in uni.

mod history for me :cool: i'm on like 95 now, and that's only cos of an oral i completly fucked up. stupid speech which was worth more than anything else........ :vcross:

what do you mean? the one on the beach WAS more corroded

yeah, i took agea answering that 7 marker. just sat there, kinda staring ahead, taking my time. wrote like 2.5 pages of absolute rhetoric crap... with some mention of metals...

yeah... white ppt for all of them... wooh! *shifty*

ahhhh, stop it with the avatar and the sig!!!

i got some answer in the most roundabout, non scientific way. just kinda followed my crazy logic, like "if this is this, then this is that". i think i got something close to the answers here so.... *fingers crossed* and i only came back to that in the last 5 minutes. couldn't figure it out...

uh.. i think i said that because it has a higher boiling point, it requires a higher energy input (as a disadvatage)... would this be in any way correct? also, do you think we had to refer to all the 3 columns in the graph, or just any reference would count as a "tick"?

me too! i for some reason decided that the standard solution is the one you find out throuh titration. so i described titration as the procedure. i guess i'll get one mark for saying "dissolve a wieghed amount of crystals" WHICH WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE QUESTION, but in more detail. i don't...

love your sig pic :D

i figured out afterwards that my calculator fucked me over. did like (a x b) x 10^3 as opposed to a x (b x 10^13) as it was meant to be..... stupid order of operation....

yeah, i feel kinda the same

hoping 80's. realistically, i might even be in the 70's. but i'm hoping not.

did you talk about them separate;y? cos i kinda said "citirc and acetic are both used for preservation and taste" and expanded. so i combined them.

i put something like AAS = appropriate technique reliability good for 1,2,3 and 5 (within 2 ppm variation wan't it?) 4 should've been discarded since it wasn't, validity kinda scrwed up

damn... i think i guessed c, but then ended up putting b. god, i can't even guess right! :rolleyes: