Search results

MATH (integral calc ssp and stats) 1905,1907 CHEM (chem ssp) 1904 MBLG (molecular bio and genetics) 1001 GRMN (german advanced) 1322

yeh that was kind of strange - the advanced candidates separated on one side and the fundamentals on the other with the groups facing each other. But the exam was ok - it could have been much worse than it turned out to be.

11pm eh - that's one late exam :rolleyes:

i'm free as well now...which means no more physics for me again, which can only be a good thing.

how unoriginal was that paper? half the questions were taken from the phys textbook exercises and some from past papers. eg problem 5.39 from university phys, 10.75 from same book.

well 1901 can get hard. We were just lucky that this year's exam was a rehash of the previous couple of years...1902 was pretty new on the other hand. Especially some of that vector stuff.

80-90ish...ran out of time for the last part of the last question.

the last qs are pretty abstract but if you can work away at them for long enough you can get a sizeable chunk of the marks. Thats where the problem lies though - time - these papers aren't easy to finish.

yep, dimensional analysis is a good skill to have in any subject, especially phys and chem.

The first one is just plugging the data into the nernst equation. Write out the nernst equation, put Ecell=0 and you get that E(standard)=RT/nF*ln(K), and K, the equilibrium constant, is the ratio of cations. As for the next part, molar activity is the activity displayed by a mole of atoms...

you know there are 0.330g I2/litre in a saturated solution. The mass (12.5g) dissolved includes this value. The remainder can be used to work out no. moles of I2 dissolved to form I3- in the reaction given and hence no. moles of I3- present in 1 litre. You've also used up some I- in forming I3-...

Almost precisely my reasons for choosing Science Med.

nah, 100 probably wasn't a realisable goal in any case. It was worth a shot though. :rolleyes:

you don't intend to continue with chem because there are more girls doing it than phys, Sedated? ;)

My list of preferences were Usyd med, UNSW med, Melbourne med, Monash med, Advanced Science at Usyd, then the token actuarial studies course at UNSW.

yeh what's with all this chem bashing anyway. Leave it alone :p

yep that's pretty much correct. I used z=x+iy to get at it. As for the second part, it's the x-axis. (I stand corrected)

haha science students don't really get the luxury of days off. If any, Friday would be good. Last semester I almost had Wednesdays off, which wasn't too bad - a little break in the middle of the week was nice.

Mandelbrot set eh. It's not as if the formula for that is complex in any case :p

haha yes, Frank Seebacher. It was "prodeen" or something like that.