Search results

hahaha... what kind of weird poll is that? the only way to get ahead is to start early or have a faster speed than others. accelerating = starting early and increasing the speed. therefore if getting ahead and doing well is your main priority then accelerating is the way to go. on...

lol. yeah think of all the money the book publishers can make... umm... publishers prolly pay BOS to make small changes so they can publish new books without re-writting it completely and make further profits from sales. :)

i thought this was about fighting. of course you can't win... who do you think you are?!?! they're teachers and you are nothing... get it??? but you're wrong about the math though. my teacher systematically take marks off like its an english exam in 3u math. you could get the right answer...

yea 25 bucks a chapter. go to this site: http://www.sngweb.com/publishing/teacherpublication.htm great solutions. i give it a 5 out of 5. :)

ok ok. i think we understand each other now with all the weird symbols... so patel can't write books properly. :) what kind of gay confusing statement is that??? it doesn't even make sense in the context of what he is talking about... ahahaha.

statement: "there is no known formula that relates (summation)@^4 with (summation)@ " what does that have to do with solving a^4 + b^4 + c^4? you get what i am saying? so what if you can't express it like that? who the hell express it like that to solve the problem you're doing? its either...

yeh its changed 1.5 years ago for the 03ers. if they do change it now... its not gonna affect us. unless you're in year 11 now...

what? what? lonney tunes?

that depends on what your definition of bullcrapping is. to me bullcrapping means writing a bunch of not needed stuff that is apparently relevant to the question according to the marking guidelines and your syllabus. there is a huge difference between understanding and just knowing what to...

already? so soon? good for her. i guess chicks are just too chicken like... umm... i might drop bio... my new bio teacher is always making fun of me in class... he reckons im a low intellect monkey who hasn't evolved yet, cause i make too much noise. :p

yea... umm... im in year 12 now so repeating chem is natural. :p yep. its all from my friend... funny you should say that... my friends are like: "you just got the notes from bos" :rolleyes:

yea hobbit lover... you can talk... grey council guardian idiot. :p what did i ever do to you??? i hate you!!! you sure you didn't misquote patel. im not having a go at you or anything but are you sure that the statement is absutely correct. when i learnt polynomials for solving that...

what the... you got tricked :p umm yea... im not gonna say anything... must stop myself from argueing with lame girls. well just one thing... chicks speak baby chicken language, so i can't understand chicks since i communicate in english. therefore all chicks are gay. :)

yeah the only reason i can think of is that the dude infact misquoted patel. im taking his statement as meaning that expressing it like this: a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = (a + b + c)^2 - 2(ab + ac + bc) is a general formula you normally remember to use to do the question. and when it is power of 4 it...

what are you saying?? shortcut? if you do it the relationship way its the longest cut you can get... but the statement of patel is ultmately flawed... unless he is talking about something else instead of polynomial roots and their relationship. at first i thought the statement meant in the...

ah yes hsc science... the pinnacle of all logical thoughts. :)

im thinking about this statement... it doesn't make sense... i mean is this not a commonly used formula to solve power of 2: a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = (a + b + c)^2 - 2(ab + ac + bc)... but that doesn't purely rely on sum(a) does it? i mean nothing does... im confused... patel is an idiot as far as im...

syllabus??? who the hell reads that? :p are they gonna give you a question like "explain qualitatively the difference between roots and zeros?"

wow did you just do that?? how fast are you? i think i've done something wrong... can you explain to me more clearly why the that statement is true... i don't think im following you... im a bit confused here. :(

lol. and? wait let me try that power of 4 thingy by expanding with algebra to get the formula in relationship form... if im not back after 20mins i gave up. :)