Search results

Ruse's last question from this years trial had absolutely nothing on the last couple questions from last years HSC (except the weight one but I swear thats ext 2)

thats so messed up 😞 you on your knees to a higher powe begging for my day and English extension atar contribution to be ruined is crazy work

I got nothing, fuck you guys you got me stressing, could I waffle about brave new world?? Ive got 0 quotes, please I need this to get rid of 1 of my advanced units 🙏

My teacher teacher high key said its shit and the average is really bad compared to the other case studies, my heart goes out to you (it seems pretty interesting though)

Holy shit, if it is I am so fucking cooked its crazy. Our teacher didnt make us do 2 elective texts so Ive only got 1 prepped. it would be so off the dome its insane

You would be like 1 of 16 kids doing it 😭

This is what my teacher said about studying 2 debates (only taught his kids 1) when he saw the paper a few years ago apparently he began running through the halls yelling (he is a very old man). So not to say focus on 3 but maybe just do the tiniest little bit, at least look over it

Ive said this very very wrong, Im not talking about the debates to do with Cleopatra's areas of debate (for which im doing role as phaoroh and gender and identity) Im talking about the question being about historical debate (which is a complete guess), as in differing or competing historical...

What is this?

From memory the mc answer sheet had my student number on it

Keep it way way simpler, if you just have 4 historians that you know in depth (as well as the obvious name droppers), drop them in 1 per para (I aimed for 4 in the trials) and incorporate at least 1 provided source per paragraph (I aimed for both in each paragraph and it worked very well for me...

I reckon its just gonna be an easy to what extent does debate in history change historiography or some shit, probably not those words but its just my guess. For that I was planning a debate per para so doing 4 debates (discovery of new evidence, reinterpretation of what is evidence (pretty much...

I just saw this and I cant lie the "major work" had me very stressed (it was my only one) but I think its worth doing. Maybe its just because I have a good teacher for it but its definitely my favourite subject and even ignoring that im doing pretty well and that it hopefully will help out with...

My teacher was feeling bad for the Julio Claudians, apparantly it wasnt great, my heart goes out to you Augustus was quite nice. Also all my predictions were wrong 😭 went 0/16

That exam was hella nice, pomp and herc was sorta a lay up, and all my other ones had very easy nice questions, Im very happy

Good luck everyone 😤 I bless you all with the exact questions you are prepared for

I guess its up to personal preference because there is no world where I'm doing 3 paragraphs for 10 marks

Was everyone reacting like this after the exam last year? Cause I genuinely feel that that was way harder then previous ones, but is that how everyone feels after sitting the exam? I mean I didnt feel like this after english

Q1 is gonna be a purpose of history question Q2 is gonna be about historical debate I feel it in my toes and they never lie

I don't think so. They only really do it if they feed it to you first, theyll give you a part a where you differentiate something and then a b where youve got to integrate something that has 2 parts but is very solvable because of a