Search results

the aesthetic is different. UNSW has a very crowded, asian culture (not been racist just stating the facts). USYD is more liberal, interacial and has a much better social life.

they kicked me out.

Re: Disappointed with your results? who cares. you cant change anything. stop looking at the glass half empty. think of the things that you have learnt, understood and then applied to foreign situations. even the simplest things. when you started in year 7, could you integrate, write a chemical...

i disagree. you should definitely do it again. if you are capable of getting a 89, you could definitely get a high 90 with another years work. realistically 89 is like 80ish raw. go well in your assessments, get rank 1 and nail the exam and it will be the best thing gods done for you. for the...

mine calc was 0.7 lower than my actual. mwahahaha.

^ +1

i feel for you. dwell today. get smashed tonight. never think of it again. and your over it.

but it has the course codes on the da list. from memory, last year it had the subjects and thus it was easier and quicker to use and find people. is there like a key that can convert course codes into subject names?

100 bucks your second in the state baulko kid. just chill. you know you are!

my frend got 43 and it was ace. every1 (teachers and stuff) were 100% that she would get 50. you just never know with them. nothing you can do really. double marked so....

like what does afternoon mean. like 12.01? or 4 o'clock?

kinda. but usually descrepencies in the difficulty of exams are taking into consideration during the 'judging process' and applying the standards - thus, your marks are aligned more. uac uses raw marks however and so yeah, i guess it would scale a lil more.

whats so funny?

yes.

really? how do they find out the atar then? coz my school always publishes the high performing students atars.

dude, if you get 90's in all your subjects (high scaling or low scaling) your gonna do well. people fret over the word 'scaling' when in reality it only affects people who get band 4's and less.

this was such a bad question imo. poorly explained. the way they describe it in the question makes it impossible to answer (with or without slingshot effect)...and i know this is what the question was getting at by saying use kepplers laws to show how the doesnt make sense but researching it...

ok, this is so pathetic. who cares, whats done is done. our marks are in. i did this question last yalando. i thought it was great. they dont give you a source for no reason. i think you needed to make a solid argument about how the source (from memory it was showing the transitional form of...

good on ya. now how the fuck does that answer the question?...........................i can here crickets.......................................

i think this was the dotpoint they were getting at:"identify that there are three types of cones, each containing a separate pigment sensitive to either blue, red or green light" and we had to link that depending where the cone was along the retina, would account for a specific colour perhaps...