Search results

i thought in ancient you only needed to present one view whereas modern the more views you know the better

i guess it's what you find easier if you like the argumentative part more then modern's easier if you like remember heaps of stuff go ancient if you want to die do history extension

i dropped at the end of year 11 because it was bad enough then lol but my school does: agrippina and augustus... as the period study which i've heard is even more of a bitch i always thought modern was heaps easier... you can make pretty much everything up, especially in core

no i disagree with you here, ancient is a much bigger subject particularly in regards to the personality study.. therefore a lot MORE to remember and what do you mean by 'sources'... if you mean historians, you don't need to know a lot of historians, 2-3 is ample to pull off an a-range essay...

you've missed the best quote: Black ram tapping your white ewe

Re: which is harder difficulty wise, they're a similar standard BUT in terms of work required ancient is much much worse some of the sections in ancient are HUGE eg 22 points, you get tested on one the key difference is one relies more on sources, the other on historians depends which one you...

my bad, i'll rephrase which uni is more fun to do law at? i heard usyd is really anal and melsc, thanks yeah i was partly refering to the philosophy of law and yeah, i want to do a law degree because it will help me in the future, not so i don't "waste" a high uai... uai's don't mean anything...

are you implying that everyone in a selective school gets tutoring? i don't, but i'm one of the very few, so i would say you're fairly correct.. 95% of my grade is tutored for at least one subject tutoring has become so bad in my school that you're no longer advantaged from getting tutored...

yeah i know i'm just being the elitist bitch i've been taught to be

lol do you go to ruse? if so, stop stealing our smart kids!

agreed, she must be really insecure if she has to reinforce it so often coming first in a 400+ ranked school doesn't exactly imply intelligence either

top five is even better

call me ignorant but i didn't even realise there were more than 200 schools in NSW either way i'd say "top ranking" meant top 10

nah i'm not interested in a top job, but it would nice to know the PM/president isn't a complete dolt and thank you :)

29/30 pretty good for a one week effort

4th! wtf, but we got the same percent as the two girls schools must've been a point difference LAME

does doing well in progress 3 hint at a good external bow mark, and by the same token does a bad internal = bad external?

Re: 回复: Re: "the naturally smart kids aren't usually the ones who do well in the HSC" it's true the really intelligent people don't feel the need to flaunt it plus it's pretty obvious how smart someone is just by the way they talk ie they can say something really intelligent without resorting...

Re: wat u guys plannin 2 do afta hsc international+global studies/law @ usyd or internationalstudies/law @ mac haven't decided which yeah.. probably mac coz they have $12K scholarships!

Re: yr 12 has attendance need at least 80% attendance your school is meant to alert you if you're cutting it fine