Search results

Going by... "the scientific laws/theories of the day" the big bang most definitely could not have been 'caused', there was essentially 'no time' before the big bang. If you can explain to me how something can be caused without time then I'll accept that to ask "What caused the big bang?" is a...

The big bang is the thing which came first in our universe, before that there was no time and you can't talk about things which exist without time as coming from anything.

nah u guys didn't really steal nikki webster, our one actually did the singing herself. Yours was a pretty doll lip synching for the uglier girl.

Yeah I just heard about this... pretty shameful stuff tbh.

Everything created has a creator. We were created. We have a creator. Name that fallacy, there's a real obvious one.

No issue what so ever, unless you're submitting it as your major work lol

same guys that designed federation square.

saying being called black is a smear campaign just lost you the crucial black vote, running as a pussy without the nigger vote will get you no where.

waffleiron 08 - unity ticket. voted for iron because i dislike him.

yeah sure sounds pretty interesting, I've always considered people's identies/desires etc to be made up of for instance small instant gratifications where people are basically on autopilot (i.e. Goal: Get up, rub eyes, scratch itch on back) and then other times where we are compelled to think...

You also failed the 'their/there/they're' test... cute. Well yeah there is so why put it out there? Cases of people being tricked because they're relying on themselves instead of something more objective like the scientific method don't really do your cause that much good.

You really believe in full on magical miracles? How cute.

oh hey :o

There's a difference as far as I understand between when say a rich man has such money and is investing it in some form or another and when the rabble has it and are using it to pay for tvs, cars, food items etc which would be inflationary, right? I.E. It's not like the rich top percent is...

On a global scale when we did such a redistribution, do you think you'd be better or worse off than you are now? I.e. I'm suggesting that every one of us is 'extremely wealthy'.

I think we're always going to need a large pool of cheap labour and that's going to have to come from somewhere... if all else is equal I'd say chances are you're more likely to be the cheap labour than the business owner.

Obviously I'm simplifying the matter... but do you think you'd be in a better or worse off situation if everyone in the world had as great opportunities as you have had?

Probably. TBH I think a bigger question for our society is whether we'd actually support say... true programs to fund relief for various countries around the world, eleviating their debt and putting them on a true even playing field with us. Would you really want everyone to have the same...

haha we can always question that... I don't know where I'd stand because tbh the poorest members of australian society might be seen as 'better off' than some africans in some tribe that has little technology, but those people might actually be much happier.

Well other than funding back to the system which does/did help you (which you obviously acknowledge) I'd merely have to say that I think our society should be more empathetic than social darwinists i.e. Just because you're naturally more gifted at creating a business etc does not mean you should...