Search results

I'm really happy we beat grammar

world smallest violin playing just for you, boo hoo, i feel your pain

no 90 was my school mark, i was ranked pretty low. the 94 was my exam mark in which i made up a stupid creative on the spot

As many of you may recall, alot of you argued with me, insulted me, berated me with unfathomable curses only because i defended the use of 2 related texts in the belonging essay. the argument finally boiled over to, well let's see how you end up going. so by writing 2 related, which you all...

only one problem christian, as a = b (a-b) = 0. therefore dividing by a-b is essentially dividing by zero and so it doesn't work

i was obviously being sarcastic. if you read this thread before you can see how many people i pissed of on this really funny subject.

very good point. i don't think anyone's brought this up before

lolololol

as fluorescent indicated and discovered so cleverly earlier, this is actually me.

oh shit your good...how on earth did you figure that out. i think that means you'll get an ATAR....yaaaaay

"im blackanese", fresh prince of bel air? wtf? are you seven years old? can you grow the fuck up? you know what grow the fuck up means?

wow, you can at least admit your idiocy. if you want to be a fucking robot and do exactly what is told without thinking then go ahead. ill think and interpret. and well see who was right at the end of December.

jeez calm down. if BOS designed the question to be interpreted in only one way then why wouldn't they just place that simple word "only" in the question. they spend months coming up with these questions and teams read and re-read to make sure there can be no mix-ups to what they want. if they...

but she placed no parameters or limits on how many. i take one, then i take another one. i did what she asked. i took one. but she didn't place an adverb specifically stating the desired amount. because no, she didn't say only. hence i can take more without going against her command.

well a three year old wouldn't necessarily have the intelligence or the capability to question. see im not three so i can see more then one interpretation. say if i took two lollies, did i go against what this mum has asked?

If someone had a jar of lots of lollies and said you could take at least one, how many lollies would you take? take more then one if you want If someone had a jar of lots of lollies and said you could take only one, how many lollies would you take? only take one If someone had a jar of lots of...

the question wasn't disregarded, only a narrow minded person would believe that the question was straightforward. you write about ONE, then another ONE, you've still answered the question as they didnt say you couldn't write more as they didn't have an ONLY before the ONE. and also, Chevalier...

absence of adverb before the adjective places no restrictions. hence writing one million related texts isn't necessarily against the question.

+1 Ritam

yeah they did it to test whether everyone would have a cry or not once marking guidelines were published. And its all semantics. i did write ONE, and i decided to write another ONE. so i wrote TWO, but i also wrote ONE and hence answered the question.