I was playin rugby league at school and some guy didnt know how to tackle properly.
He dislocated it and chipped off like 10% of it.
Yeah, i'm still goin but i wont be able to do too much. Cant drive my manual car so i'm grabbin a lift with a friend.
That fall woulda hurt...
I'm sure...
yeah I agree with that. From memory we did aboriginal minority groups i think as a focus. I dont think they'll be putting in a question like that again, probably just a bit too obscure.
To be honest I dont think this petition will get very far but. They've already taken a course of action...
I didnt do family or study juveniles as a focus area. I'm not claiming that I did well in answering the question or that it wasnt a hard question. In fact I'm not expecting to get full marks for it.
It was supposed to be hard. Most people were supposed to find it hard to answer.
I havent told...
Yeah, theres some I wont really miss because they didnt have that kinda attitude - they just taught us and that was it.
There were some excellent stories and opinions and that from a few of my teachers that i'll miss. My legal studies teacher would tell us a story or a joke or something almost...
Every student still had the chance to get full marks (or at least some marks) in that question as long as they knew how to apply their knowledge to the situation.
To say that not everyone had the chance to get full marks in any question is a big statement unless it was completely unrelated to...
Lozacious, if you dont want to be part of an open forum then just keep it to yourself.
Not-That-Bright actually posted those views a while ago, and I was simply agreeing.
This forum is not designed to be a one-on-one name-calling fight
If you read it properly....
It was a question that mostly only band 6 people were supposed to be able to answer well. therefore the majority would have trouble answering it. The goal of the test is to get a range of marks from band 1 to band 6.
I think it is you who is missing the point...
Now you're just being stupid for the sake of an argument. They didnt ask us a physics question because it wasnt a physics test. Maybe you're in the wrong topic?
Accessibility is in the LEGAL STUDIES syllabus, so no matter how obscure it was you could answer it using your knowledge if LEGAL...
I'm goin up with a group of about 10 or so for a week from November 26, stayin at a couple houses in fingal bay. We were lookin for a place a bit more quiet than gold coast but it sounds good that theres a few groups goin
Sorry, you're right. I remember we called it mass increase, not decrease.
Guess I just wasnt thinking right last time. Glad I didnt make the same mistake in the test.
Thanks for setting me straight
Theres still some valid arguments in the rest of the post but. If you wrote nothing dont expect any special treatment - that was stupid. The questions were supposed to be hard but if you thought about it would've been easy to gain at least a few marks. As Not-That-Bright said, even if you just...
That was just an initial thought after a first read through. I'll be happy with a mid range band 5. Apparently this years test was a bit harder than previously so the average will probably be lower than normal.
I'm goin to a bonfire on someones property after the exams are over. Optional burning of notes. I'm selling my study guides and that, burning maths and english for sure. Not sure what I'm doin with my legal studies/chem/bio/physics notes. Recycling sounds like a good idea. Dont really have many...