Carrotsticks
Retired
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2009
- Messages
- 9,494
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
I don't really see what the problem is.
Most of those arguing against this accept the 'Limiting Sum' formula, but appear to be rejecting the idea of 0.9999... = 1, when it is actually the exact same concept.
The result can be proved trivially using a Geometric Series argument or even one using Cauchy Sequences.
The reason why this works is because we have INFINITE 9's, not finite. When introduced to the concept of infinity, things get a whole lot different.
ie: Why can you bracket finite terms and manipulate the commutative law of addition, but not do so with infinite terms?
This article may clear a few things up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_series_theorem
Most of those arguing against this accept the 'Limiting Sum' formula, but appear to be rejecting the idea of 0.9999... = 1, when it is actually the exact same concept.
The result can be proved trivially using a Geometric Series argument or even one using Cauchy Sequences.
The reason why this works is because we have INFINITE 9's, not finite. When introduced to the concept of infinity, things get a whole lot different.
ie: Why can you bracket finite terms and manipulate the commutative law of addition, but not do so with infinite terms?
This article may clear a few things up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_series_theorem