this isnt the one that the other person was talking about, but it has case studies as well:
www.acehsc.net
11 and 12 were so great but 14 was cooked
Yeah 11 & 12 were almost deceivingly easy, but I could barely do 1411 and 12 were so great but 14 was cooked
Interesting, thanks
Thank youu
yeah 11 and 12 were light, 13 was rough and i didn't get a single answer for 1411 and 12 were so great but 14 was cooked
it was easier than i expected tbh .. q14 was pretty bad though and i couldnt do 13d
too real my q14 booklet was looking a lot more blank than the other ones...yeah 11 and 12 were light, 13 was rough and i didn't get a single answer for 14
I managed to fill most of it out but it was all working out that led to nothing lmao, hopefully the markers take pity on it
reallll i have stuff where i gave up halfway, hopefully they'll at least give a pity mark for trying
Same I basically just te wrote the questions
agreed
, half of 14 was good the rest not so much
im gonna be honest i dont think soGuyssss! Do you think I can scrape an e3 if I have a raw mark of 33 or 34 out of 70 for maths extension 1?
check this thread Maths Extension 1 Predictions/Thoughts | Bored Of Studies
Damn, but for previous years you needed a raw mark of 31 out of 70 to get an e3. So if this year's test was easier ("according to others), does that mean I'll be scaled down?
bruh i got some fraction with a root 17 or smt (i'm probably wrong and generally very cooked)For the find values for arctan3x+arctan10x=3pi/4 I just plugged random numbers into the calc and got x=1/2
no way omg is this accuratethat not that bad, math is hard, I'm gonna fumble biz and bio, hopefully get like raw above 70 in legal, but prob not ,
I do have hope fo scaling tho, cause according to
HSC Raw Marks Database
for bio in 2022 a 53 are mark aligned to a 71
and for biz in 2022 a 68alinged to a 80
and in 2021 a 66 alinged to a 80, so both years that's a band 5
