I'm sorry but there is no way they can specify it as a discursive right? Especially one on fucking nature!!! I mean, would it not genuinely fuck over half the state?
I'm sorry but there is no way they can specify it as a discursive right? Especially one on fucking nature!!! I mean, would it not genuinely fuck over half the state?
I'm sorry but there is no way they can specify it as a discursive right? Especially one on fucking nature!!! I mean, would it not genuinely fuck over half the state?
ofc ill stay i need to sort some of these people out like wdym u genuinely believe nesa would make a test designed to be unseen and then just tell you one of the essays for funsies?
ofc ill stay i need to sort some of these people out like wdym u genuinely believe nesa would make a test designed to be unseen and then just tell you one of the essays for funsies?
Extracts for A and B are generally fine - for Eliot if we are given an extract it must shape your overall thesis in response to the question and then be featured in all paragraphs - I also suggest beginning the essay with "As stated in the extract...
im not making shit up bro im just relaying what i hear. and now that is a 15 mark discursive 5 mark reflection which makes me doubt there is one in the first place
im not making shit up bro im just relaying what i hear. and now that is a 15 mark discursive 5 mark reflection which makes me doubt there is one in the first place
im not making shit up bro im just relaying what i hear. and now that is a 15 mark discursive 5 mark reflection which makes me doubt there is one in the first place