MedVision ad

4u Mathematics Marathon V 1.0 (1 Viewer)

Sober

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
215
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
pLuvia said:
I'll post up the answers, forget about the last 2 :)
Why forget the last two? And I don't think you mean 'undefined', surely you mean non-analytic?

Besides this doesn't seem very 4 unitish.

3) y = |x| + |x-2|

(0, 2) and (2, 2)

4) y = |x| - |x-2|

(0, -2) and (2, 2)
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Actually, it is completely within the scope of the 4-unit syllabus, and is taught in both Patel and Cambridge. :)
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
next question:

let In = ∫(pi/2 --> pi/6) cosecnx dx, where n is a positive integer.

(i) using integration, show that:

(n-1)In = 2n-2*sqrt3 + (n-2)In-2

(ii) Evaluate J = ∫(pi/3 --> 0)sec4x dx
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
time to revive an old thread...

bump. please have a look at the previous post for the question to get the ball rolling!

remember, when you answer a question, you must provide a question yourself!
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Sure Mountain.Dew:

I assume you meant In = ∫Cosecn(x)dx {pi/6-->pi/2}

(i) Now,

In = ∫Cosecn(x)dx
= ∫Cosecn-2(x)Cosec2(x)dx

Let u = Cosecn-2(x)
du = -(n-2)Cosecn-2(x)Cot(x)dx
v = ∫Cosec2xdx = -Cot(x)

Using IBP,
In = -Cot(x)Cosecn-2(x) - (n-2) ∫Cosecn-2(x)(Cosec2(x)-1)dx
= -Cot(x)Cosecn-2(x) - (n-2) In + (n-2) In-2

Rearranging, (n-1)In = -Cot(x)Cosecn-2(x) + (n-2) In-2

Subbing in the limits in the first part,

[-Cot(x)Cosecn-2(x)] {pi/6 --> pi/2}
= 0 + Cot(pi/6)Cosecn-2(pi/6)
= Sqrt[3] 2n-2

Thus, we have (n-1)In = Sqrt[3] 2n-2 + (n-2) In-2 as required.

(ii) I assume you meant: Evaluate J = ∫Sec4(x)dx {0-->pi/3}

Now, J = ∫Sec4(x)dx {0-->pi/3}

Let u = pi/2 - x
du = -dx

Thus, J = -∫Cosec4(u)du {pi/2-->pi/6}
= ∫Cosec4(u)du {pi/6-->pi/2}
= I4

Now, I4 = {22 Sqrt[3] + 2I2}/3
I2 = {2^0 Sqrt[3] + 0}/1 = Sqrt[3]

Thus, I4 = {22 Sqrt[3] + 2Sqrt[3]}/3 = 2 Sqrt[3]

The final answer is J = I4 = 2 Sqrt[3] #

Next Q
Find lim {n-->+infinity} ∫dx/(1+x^4) {0 --> n}

Big hint:
What happens when you use the substitution x=1/u?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Stan..

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
278
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
1/u = x
Limits become,
0 and Infinity
I u^2/(u^4 + 1) du Limits( Infinity & 0)
I = 1/2Arctan(u^2) * u - I
2I = Infinity
I = Infinity

EDIT: Are we allowed to use the hint? Partial Fractions become very difficult but eventually yield the same answer.
 

Gowr

New Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
21
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
er....no
I get something completely different

I= integral(u^2/u^4+1)
=integral (u^2)/(u^2+sqr(2)u+1)(u^2-sqr(2)u+1)
= integral ((u^2+1)/(u^2+sqr(2)u+1)(u^2-sqr(2)u+1) - 1/(u^4+1))
= integral (1/2 (1/(u^2+sqr(2)u+1) + 1/(u^2-sqr(2)u+1)) - I
4I=integral (1/((u+1/sqr(2))^2 +1/2) + 1/((u-1/sqr(2)^2 +1/2))
I=1/4 (sqr(2)tan^-1 (sqr(2)(u+1/sqr(2)) + sqr(2)tan^-1(sqr(2)(u-1/sqr(2)))
I= 1/4 (sqr(2) *pi/2 *2)
I=pi*sqr(2)/4

and no, i haven't checked my algebra... so someone tell me if this is even remotely correct please

But i know the answer posted by stan has got to be incorrect, as the limit of integral 1/(u^2+1) from 0 to infinity is pi/2, so it would not make much sense if the limit of the integral of 1/(u^4+1), which is smaller, is infinity, plus, technically infinity is not a limit, so it would be misleading for a limit question to have an answer of infinity :)
 
Last edited:
P

pLuvia

Guest
*Bump* Might as well get this up and running again :p

Evaluate this integral:
∫e-xsinxdx
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yip

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
140
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
∫e<sup>-x</sup>sinxdx=-e<sup>-x</sup>sinx+e<sup>-x</sup>cosxdx=-e<sup>-x</sup>sinx+[-e<sup>-x</sup>cosx- ∫e<sup>-x</sup>sinxdx]
∫e<sup>-x</sup>sinxdx=(-e<sup>-x</sup>/2)(sinx+cosx)+C

Q. Evaluate
∫{[ln(x+1)]/(x<sup>2</sup>+1)}dx with 0 as the bottom limit and 1 as the top
<sup></sup>
 
Last edited:

shsshs

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
94
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
gman03 said:
Q: integrate 1/(1+e^x) dx

let y = e^x
then dy/y = dx

int 1/(1+e^x) dx
= int dy/y(1+y)
= int dy/y - int dy/(1+y) by partial fraction
= ln (y/(1+y)) + C
= - ln (1+e^-x) + C


Q: integrate 1/(e^x-e^-x) dx
wth r all u ppl doing.. why not juss (+ e^x - e^x) to the numerator

then its just 1 - (e^X)/(1 + e^X)
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
shsshs said:
wth r all u ppl doing.. why not juss (+ e^x - e^x) to the numerator

then its just 1 - (e^X)/(1 + e^X)
That certainly works, much better than resorting to partial fractions. ;)
 

darkliight

I ponder, weak and weary
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
341
Location
Central Coast, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Yip said:
Q. Evaluate ∫{[ln(x+1)]/(x<sup>2</sup>+1)}dx with 0 as the bottom limit and 1 as the top
Maple says you're being a bit harsh ...

int(ln(x+1)/(x^2+1), x=0..1) = (i/2)*dilog(1/2+i/2)-(i/2)*dilog(1/2-i/2)+πln(2)/4-Catalan

Changing it to ∫ xln(x^2 + 1)/(x^2 + 1) dx
 

Yip

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
140
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Bump, enlighten us Yip
∫<sub>0</sub>1{[ln(x+1)]/(x<sup>2</sup>+1)}dx
Let x=tan(u)
dx=sec<sup>2</sup>udu
I=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{[ln(tan+1)]/sec<sup>2</sup>u}sec<sup>2</sup>udu
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{[ln(tan+1)]du
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{[ln|{sin+cos}/cos|}du
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{[ln|{sin+cos}|-ln|cos|}du
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{[ln|root2[cos(u-π/4)]|-ln|cos|}du
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{0.5ln2+ln|cos(u-π/4)]|-ln|cos|]}du
Consider I=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4[ln|cos(u-π/4)]|]du=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4[ln|cos(π/4-u)]|][cos is even]
Let π/4-u=t
du=-dt
I=-∫<sub>pi/4</sub>0[ln|cos(t)|]dt
=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4{ln|cos(t)|]dt=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4ln|cos|]}du

Thus,

∫<sub>0</sub>1{[ln(x+1)]/(x<sup>2</sup>+1)}dx=∫<sub>0</sub>π/4(0.5ln2)du
=0.5[ln2(pi/4)}=π/8[ln2]
//

[SIZE=-1]満足が行く[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]の,[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]プルビアさん?:p[/SIZE]
 

.ben

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
492
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Yip said:
Q. Evaluate [/B] ∫{[ln(x+1)]/(x<sup>2</sup>+1)}dx with 0 as the bottom limit and 1 as the top
<sup></sup>
- did you get this question from Putnam 2005?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top