Alright, after trawling through and having to read and critically analyse these today, I thought people might want to have a read of them as well.
Steven Schwartz vs Di Yerbury:
Part 1
Part 2
Appendix:
Deloitte Executive Summary
Schwartz's Lawyers and their Letter to Yerbury after the seizing of her documents
Yerbury to Chancellor
A second letter to Chancellor 'thanking' and offering a possible 'non legal' resolution
Schwartz to Internal Auditors
Di Yerbury Bonus Claim Part 1
Di Yerbury Bonus Claim Part 2
Victor Ma
Part 1
Quite a good read for those interested in a 'fuller' picture of things, and I'll see whether I can post more of what I find later on, depending on how I go with this PR assignment.
My favourite line has got to be:
Steven Schwartz vs Di Yerbury:
Part 1
Part 2
Appendix:
Deloitte Executive Summary
Schwartz's Lawyers and their Letter to Yerbury after the seizing of her documents
Yerbury to Chancellor
A second letter to Chancellor 'thanking' and offering a possible 'non legal' resolution
Schwartz to Internal Auditors
Di Yerbury Bonus Claim Part 1
Di Yerbury Bonus Claim Part 2
Victor Ma
Part 1
Quite a good read for those interested in a 'fuller' picture of things, and I'll see whether I can post more of what I find later on, depending on how I go with this PR assignment.
My favourite line has got to be:
from one of the articles.Deloittes 2005-2005 audit also questioned the governance of MUSC and asked Mr Ma this year to confirm that his wife -- paid $76,555 as a full-time MUSC staffer -- "does not hold paid employment elsewhere."
MUSC advertised in January 2004 for a manager with "a substantial financial background", Mr Warfield said.
Of three candidates, one did not turn up, the second "did not meet the requirement of being able to speak Cantonese and Mandarin" and the third was Ms Kwai, MUSC minutes said.