Phanatical said:
Phanatical does not. My concern for the sanctity of human life is not religious in nature (ie, all life is precious). Rather, I believe in the Quality of life. And I could not support bringing somebody into the world with the stigma of being the product of rape. I do not believe a child can have quality of life with the knowledge that he or she is the product of rape, and more specifically if the mother does not feel she can give the child quality of life.
But where a child is conceived through acts that are mutually consentual between the father and the mother, the parents have a responsibility to provide the best quality of life as possible. And if a prospective parent does not feel he or she can provide quality of life to any children they bear, they should not commit acts that could result in the creation of life. If they do, and they kill this life, then they are no better than murderers.
1. How can you suggest that it is ok for an abortion if the child is a product of a rape on the assumption that the child's life will be so drastically lessened due to stigma? Stigma is what snobs use to degrade people. It only matters to do people who care. I would submit that having to raise a child in an environment where the mother and father are not psychologically ready for birth is more dangerous to the mother and childs HEALTH than having to be subject to stigma.
We all know that the birth of a child that was the result of rape is likely to cause mental problems for the child and mother. This is why many victims of rape, if they fall pregnant, terminate. However who is to say that this is any worse than a mother is not psychologically ready for child birth? Surely you cannot justify your position based on a value judgment. In either case you are making exceptions to life which is very odd for an ardent pro lifer as yourself.
Which comes back to the reason WHY you believe there should be an exception to rape and why you harp on about adults being consenting and responsible about sex. It is because you really do not care about the life of the child. You are concerned about responsibilities between adults. Not about whether the child is killed or 'murdered'. If you did care you would be against the termination of a child, regardless of how, when or where it was conceived. Becasue regradless of how, when or where the child was conceived life, in the view of pro lifers as yourself, has been created and to kill such a life would be murder.
2. How, when and where the child is conceived should not concern ardent pro lifers as yourself. Your main concern is that there has been conception and that if life has been created it is murder if this life is terminated. No ifs no buts. No exceptions. If you suggest that it is ok for a fetus, that has been produce as a result of a rape, to be terminated then you are a murderer according to your own standards. A life has been created and it has been terminated.
AGAIN
The method in which the child was conceived is irrelevant. In the view of a pro lifer as yourself LIFE HAS BEEN CREATED. From the Pro lifer perspective the life of the child is being killed off or murdered to use your own words.