yeh, umm..janet i thinkbaker182 said:20% that kinda reflects on the lectuerIs it still the South African lady?
but now apparently we have bruce, an american dude, but i missed his first lecture so i'm not sure what he's like yet
Acfi2080... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Cyph
- Start date
but now apparently we have bruce, an american dude, but i missed his first lecture so i'm not sure what he's like yet
SoCal
Hollywood
Yeah, I am sick of all the repeated content in the different subjectsbaker182 said:The topics are also in another ECON 3year subject, which I'am doing next year
!Haha, that is so true and something that me and my mates have comented on beforebaker182 said:
.
SoCal
Hollywood
Bruce McFarling? He is an alright lecturer. I had him for one of my subjects last semester. He gets heaps into item_516 said:
. The bad thing about him is that he tries to made everything to simple that he just ends up confusing you, if that makes any sense, haha.I think Brcue is shitSoCal said:Bruce McFarling? He is an alright lecturer. I had him for one of my subjects last semester. He gets heaps into it
I prefer James over Bruce
SoCal
Hollywood
Haha, no-one could possibly be worse than James in my opinion. I have had him for the first half of ECON2520 and I only bothered to go to the first two lectures because it is a waste of time. He has a really bad accent, mumbles to himself, reads of the lecture slides and doesn't really explain the concepts.
.
SoCal
Hollywood
Damn, there are so many subjects I want to do next year that I am having trouble deciding which ones to do. I think I am going to try and do five subjects each semester next year.
.yuck..have fun with that :S
bruce isn't so bad..MUCH better than janet, that's for sure..i listened a lot more yesterday than i do normally so that could be a good thing..got my test result back today.. :S
bruce isn't so bad..MUCH better than janet, that's for sure..i listened a lot more yesterday than i do normally so that could be a good thing..got my test result back today.. :S
One person said that the average was 35% and another said it was less than that. I really doubt they have access to information like that though. Some people want it to be scaled, but I don't think that's going to happen.em_516 said:
Were you happy with your result?
Congrats. Yeh I was pretty stoked that I passed.
I ended up getting 58%, which well even though I’m happy I passed, is disappointing. Its annoying in the sense that I got a pretty good mark in question one of the short answers, yet I only managed to get 28.5/50 overall for that section. The time limit brought my mark down a fair bit. I made 3 really stupid mistakes in mc. It could have been a lot worse though.
I ended up getting 58%, which well even though I’m happy I passed, is disappointing. Its annoying in the sense that I got a pretty good mark in question one of the short answers, yet I only managed to get 28.5/50 overall for that section. The time limit brought my mark down a fair bit. I made 3 really stupid mistakes in mc. It could have been a lot worse though.
haha..i got 57.5
i made TONNES of stupid mistakes..got numerous zeros from not doing questions and having REALLY shit answers..the whole paper is depressing to look at lol..but, ultimately i passed and that's all i wanted..just it's always nice to get higher marks
i made TONNES of stupid mistakes..got numerous zeros from not doing questions and having REALLY shit answers..the whole paper is depressing to look at lol..but, ultimately i passed and that's all i wanted..just it's always nice to get higher marks
lol, my exam is really depressing to look at. I was going through my short answers and the first two pages were like really good. Then as I kept going through I saw a whole page with zeros everywhere (either not attempted or just plain wrong). That continued for like 2 pages and then on the final page I only managed to get one answer done and correct (thankfully a 4 mark question). I can only imagine my tutors face when she marked my paper
SoCal
Hollywood
Of course he is better than Janet. You would be hard pressed to find a lecturer worse than Janetem_516 said:
.That average mark is quite possible. As I said before, according to one of my mates who did the course in second semester last year, the average mark in one of the in-class tests was supposedly about 30%. They won't scale the mark, however, they may give you the option of it not counting if you do better in the final exam or something, at least that is what I recall him saying they were thinking of doingCraig said:
.i can't see how it'd be that low..i knew fuck all and i managed high 50s..i can see how people who didn't study at all would have gotten a low mark, but geez, almost everyone in macro seems to know what they're talking about
SoCal
Hollywood
Haha, there must be a mistake. There is no way I could have got 25/30! I didn't study at all and I have only read the first three chapters of the book. That is the same mark I got for the ACFI2070 mid-semester quiz and I actually studied for that test. They must have marked this exam very easily. How did you go baker182?
! I didn't study at all and I have only read the first three chapters of the book. That is the same mark I got for the ACFI2070 mid-semester quiz and I actually studied for that test. They must have marked this exam very easily. How did you go baker182?Only got 19.5SoCal said:Haha, there must be a mistake. There is no way I could have got 25/30
Hey mate do you know Anna Christie?