MedVision ad

Advantages of being a republic.. (1 Viewer)

Do you think Australia should become a republic?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • No

    Votes: 8 30.8%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • Don't Care

    Votes: 2 7.7%

  • Total voters
    26

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
But it's not our country. Point.
Soldiers fought under the Australian government they elected, not the flag
 

banco55

Active Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,577
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Iron said:
But it's not our country. Point.
Soldiers fought under the Australian government they elected, not the flag
You don't have to be able to trace your lineage back to the first fleet to realize that the British influence on Australia is everywhere. From the language, the form of government, to the way our history developed etc. When they march at Anzac day they don't carry photos of John Curtin. They carry the flag. There's a reason why the generation that went through WW II are the most resistant to changing the flag.
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
What's the bet Menzies went blue bc of the communists?
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
banco55 said:
Haha, it just hit me that a lot of (psuedo-?) sophisticates don't like the flag because they have a black arm band view of Australian history. Hopefully when they leave uni they will grow out of it and realize that there's a lot to be said for keeping the flag that our grandfathers etc. fought under. Not to mention acknowledging our links with the country that gave the world shakespeare, newton, adam smith etc. isn't such a bad thing.
I dislike nationalism full stop, to be honest, and much of the 'us-them' complex which it sets up. You only 'die for a flag' in a figurative sense - it's the ideals behind the flag which are important, I feel. I'm sure much of this is just my inner iconoclast being brought out.

On links to England --> our cultural ties will remain regardless (though they may diminish/change over time of course). The intellectual ones are going to be present as soon as you walk into The Academy to receive a western education. I'm not quite sure what formal, symbolic recognition adds in this instance.
 

banco55

Active Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,577
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
KFunk said:
I dislike nationalism full stop, to be honest, and much of the 'us-them' complex which it sets up. You only 'die for a flag' in a figurative sense - it's the ideals behind the flag which are important, I feel. I'm sure much of this is just my inner iconoclast being brought out.

On links to England --> our cultural ties will remain regardless (though they may diminish/change over time of course). The intellectual ones are going to be present as soon as you walk into The Academy to receive a western education. I'm not quite sure what formal, symbolic recognition adds in this instance.
I think you're defining nationalism down. There's a difference between patriotism and nationalism. Your definition of nationalism seems to be anyone who takes pride in their country without immediately issuing all these caveats about how racist Australia has been in the past etc. Nationalism is people in Serbia wanting a piece of surrounding countries etc. or people in Scotland wanting to break off from the UK.
 

incentivation

Hmmmmm....
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
558
Location
Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Iron said:
But it's not our country. Point.
Soldiers fought under the Australian government they elected, not the flag
Possibly not our 'land', but certainly our country. A country consists of more than mere 'terra firma'. I see the country as being defined more by the economic, social and political make up of the society which inhabits the land.
 

dieburndie

Eat, Sleep, Repeat
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
971
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
banco55 said:
I think you're defining nationalism down. There's a difference between patriotism and nationalism. Your definition of nationalism seems to be anyone who takes pride in their country without immediately issuing all these caveats about how racist Australia has been in the past etc. Nationalism is people in Serbia wanting a piece of surrounding countries etc. or people in Scotland wanting to break off from the UK.
That's one form of nationalism, and those are extreme examples.

Being proud of your country when you did not contribute to the accomplishments you are proud of, is another form of nationalism.
 

banco55

Active Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,577
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
dieburndie said:
That's one form of nationalism, and those are extreme examples.

Being proud of your country when you did not contribute to the accomplishments you are proud of, is another form of nationalism.
They are not really extreme. If you have any familiarity with foreign cultures you'll know that those feelings are quite common ie Mexicans who think Texas was stolen from them, Argentinians who want the Falklands back, Polish who want land back from Russia etc. There was a protest in Tehran on the weekend that 200 000 attended. They were protesting against the name of the "persian gulf" being changed. That is nationalism. Australia doesn't have anything similar.

You can be proud of your parents accomplishments without claiming them as your own. The inevitable result of your argument is that you can't be proud of your country.

I still think your definition is a misuse of the word "nationalism". It's like people who label every law and order measure adopted by the Government as "facist". The world eventually becomes meaningless. What you are describing is "patriotism".
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
incentivation said:
Possibly not our 'land', but certainly our country. A country consists of more than mere 'terra firma'. I see the country as being defined more by the economic, social and political make up of the society which inhabits the land.
OK.
Economically, socially, politically, geographically, we are not the same country as the United Kingdom.
Sorry for the confusion. Better?

Look, I love Britain and the Monarchy and the history, literature, comedy, accents, teeth, ETC as much as anyone...But..wait..
I dont have the energy or will to lead a Mugabe-style Independence movement against the Imperialist British with their plots and schemings to destroy this contaree mun
 

dieburndie

Eat, Sleep, Repeat
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
971
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
banco55 said:
They are not really extreme. If you have any familiarity with foreign cultures you'll know that those feelings are quite common ie Mexicans who think Texas was stolen from them, Argentinians who want the Falklands back, Polish who want land back from Russia etc. There was a protest in Tehran on the weekend that 200 000 attended. They were protesting against the name of the "persian gulf" being changed. That is nationalism. Australia doesn't have anything similar.
I'm not saying they are extreme because of infrequency, just that nationalism in that sense is a stronger force than that common in Australia.
You can be proud of your parents accomplishments without claiming them as your own. The inevitable result of your argument is that you can't be proud of your country.
No, you can be proud of whatever you want. The result of my argument is that it is irrational to be proud of your country.
I still think your definition is a misuse of the word "nationalism". It's like people who label every law and order measure adopted by the Government as "facist". The world eventually becomes meaningless. What you are describing is "patriotism".
Seriously, look the word up.
Using Fascism to describe any measure of law and order is misusing the term, as the definition of the ideology is clearly not applicable to such a situation.

This is not the case with nationalism. Look it up. Every definition I can find allows for the sense that I've been using the term in.
But I don't care, use patriotism if you're so uncomfortable with me correctly using a synonymous word...
 

spyro14

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
208
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
How can you say that you can't use the term Fascism to describe any measure of law. If a law is characterised by a extreme right wing authoritarian perspective, what else would you use to describe it?
 

dieburndie

Eat, Sleep, Repeat
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
971
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
spyro14 said:
How can you say that you can't use the term Fascism to describe any measure of law. If a law is characterised by a extreme right wing authoritarian perspective, what else would you use to describe it?
I meant calling any measure of law and order fascism rather than the action to which it applies is incorrect , in the same context banco55 originally suggested.
 

_dhj_

-_-
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,562
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I'm in the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" camp. Imo a republic declaration is something which a nation earns through historical struggle. There's no point in turning our backs on tradition merely for the sake of it. I feel that if it happens without a real catalyst or a struggle, and not just with a "we're Australians and we should be proud of it" sort of weak nationalism pushed by the elite few, it won't be as genuine or as worthwhile as something which will (probably) only happen once in history deserves to be.
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The catalyst was the fall of Singapore and rise of neo-liberalism
 

what971

Now in Oriental Flavour!
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
1,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
There is no advantage of being a Republic. Being part of the British Empire is a glorious tradition that we should all be proud to be a part of.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top