carrots please!
not a malcontent
question:
how exactly do the weightings of assessment tasks contribute to ranks? i mean, i understand the general principle of it being better to do well on highly weighted assessments, but how are they collated?
i presume that having three tasks of the same weight would mean that the average would be found by adding and diving by three, but what about differently weighted tasks? say, if i get 85% on a task worth 25%, how does that compare to getting 90% on a task weighted 10%? or is it all worked out on the program teachers enter our marks on?
thanks guys.
hah, obviously a general maths student
how exactly do the weightings of assessment tasks contribute to ranks? i mean, i understand the general principle of it being better to do well on highly weighted assessments, but how are they collated?
i presume that having three tasks of the same weight would mean that the average would be found by adding and diving by three, but what about differently weighted tasks? say, if i get 85% on a task worth 25%, how does that compare to getting 90% on a task weighted 10%? or is it all worked out on the program teachers enter our marks on?
thanks guys.
hah, obviously a general maths student