Anyone see the herald article about the two Tony leadership? What an appaling suggestion. Never mind the 101 reasons why Abbott should not lead but what would Smith reall add to the ticket as deputy?
I think there are three types of deputy leaders and Smith doesn't really fit any of them. Theres the older figure, more gravitas, sturdies the party, deeply respect etc etc which would be best served by Robb. The second but different leader kind of deputy like Costello, Gillard and Bishop. The younger, energetic, exciting but lacking gravitas, good heir apparent, Paul Keating style deputy of which the libs best choice would surely be Pyne.
How Smith fits into any of these I do not know. I realise he is young but he's hardly someone who you think will serve under a leader for eight years or so then when they decide to give it away he will inherit it.
If there is any truth to the story than it is a desperate attempt by the conservative wing of the party to stop yet another progressive(hockey) taking the leadership and distancing themselves from the Howard glory days.