stay the hell away from the fx5200. worst $150 spent, ever (bought it about a year ago).Korn said:Try out the FX5200 or the cards of GeForce or Radeon at around the $100 mark if u dont need a high performer
Yeah I did, he is after a low performance card, most ppl here are talking about the higher end. Then there are you and nekkid talking about random shite of who is in avatars.equiski said:Korn, did you even read the rest of the thread?
I have a FX5200 as well. I have no problem with the FX. It is a pretty good budget card. I just think that instead of dropping 50-60 bucks on a very low end card, he may as well pay an extra 50 bucks to buy a far more powerful card which will last him alot longer. He did say <$150 .Korn said:Yeah I did, he is after a low performance card, most ppl here are talking about the higher end. Then there are you and nekkid talking about random shite of who is in avatars.
Oh btw whats wrong with the FX5200, i have had it since January 2004 & aint had problems
Yeah, but as he did say he is mainly a strat gamer and they have low hardware demand, but if I remember correctly AOE3 will need 128mb vid card, and the FX5200 satisfies this.equiski said:I have a FX5200 as well. I have no problem with the FX. It is a pretty good budget card. I just think that instead of dropping 50-60 bucks on a very low end card, he may as well pay an extra 50 bucks to buy a far more powerful card which will last him alot longer. He did say <$150 .
I wouldn't talk Sasha out of buying something like a FX5200 / R9100 / R9200 though, especially if he got it for $40 or less. I just don't want him to regret it a year down the track.
AOE3 looks downright gorgeous. Though the 5200 will run it, I'm not sure to whether it will run it well. This will be the case if the game uses DX9 functions, which the card can run but is too slow to use in most situations.Korn said:Yeah, but as he did say he is mainly a strat gamer and they have low hardware demand, but if I remember correctly AOE3 will need 128mb vid card, and the FX5200 satisfies this.
Also my questioning about the card was directed to Nekkid, sorry about the confusion
Yeah, but if u have enough RAM it shouldnt be a problem should it, I have 1024MB DDR-400equiski said:AOE3 looks downright gorgeous. Though the 5200 will run it, I'm not sure to whether it will run it well. This will be the case if the game uses DX9 functions, which the card can run but is too slow to use in most situations.
Many MX440 based cards satisfies the 128mb requirement, but I doubt it would run a game like that.
True, but im hoping they dont jack it up too much otherwise thats bs,equiski said:Ram isn't everything.
which is the position im in right now (i have an fx5200 too)equiski said:I just don't want him to regret it a year down the track.
Is that bad? Im not to knowledgable on frame ratesnekkid said:which is the position im in right now (i have an fx5200 too)
maybe its just my card, but for games like far cry, doom 3 and FPS, i could barely get above 20-25fps. im just saying, paying an extra $20-30 to get something better would be worth it.
boys boys boys. lots been said about what i want and dont want, but ok . yeh actually AOE3 was my main reason for wanting an upgrade. and thanks korn for suggesting yuor card, but i still want the best i can get for 150 , for some reason the lower the price then 150 for a card i feel it will be infirior and i would rather pay for abit more for that bit better card.equiski said:AOE3 looks downright gorgeous. Though the 5200 will run it, I'm not sure to whether it will run it well. This will be the case if the game uses DX9 functions, which the card can run but is too slow to use in most situations.
Many MX440 based cards satisfies the 128mb requirement, but I doubt it would run a game like that.
from what i was reading up on. the top cards get around 100+ frame rate. so 25-35 is much less.Korn said:Is that bad? Im not to knowledgable on frame rates
Shit ey, but is it really noticable?SashatheMan said:from what i was reading up on. the top cards get around 100+ frame rate. so 25-35 is much less.
Oh ok. You see, I don't mind 25 - 30fps framerates so much. I had to tweak doom 3 a bit for it to run at a playable framerate (and not to totally stall when entering a new room).nekkid said:which is the position im in right now (i have an fx5200 too)
maybe its just my card, but for games like far cry, doom 3 and FPS, i could barely get above 20-25fps. im just saying, paying an extra $20-30 to get something better would be worth it.
Shit so what could you sell the FX5200 for second hand and what is the best card to upgrade to a radeon or GeForce? I'm only willing to buy from a store not netequiski said:Oh ok. You see, I don't mind 25 - 30fps framerates so much. I had to tweak doom 3 a bit for it to run at a playable framerate (and not to totally stall when entering a new room).
Korn and Sasha: Gamers tend to aim for 60fps or higher. It depends on the individual though. Framerates aren't so important in strategy games. They are more of a focus in action orientated games.
nekkid said:are those images on the main site of AOE3 screenshots? if they are, holy jebus.
@SashatheMan - well 100+ would be awesome, but the average would be around 60-70 or so.
damn those screenshots were awesome. im gonna start playing strategy games now :uhhuh: