Bestiality in Australia (2 Viewers)

[HNAKXR]

nothing wholesome left in this world, thanks to homosexuals a man can't even fly a kite or Rollerblade, or have a splendid time with a tootsie pop without being regarded as a turd-burgler.

actually that stuff was always kind of gay, but nevertheless my point stands.

 

[Enteebee]

conclusions of the day, there is nothing wrong with:

*Homosexuality
*Sadomasochism
*Bestiality
*sexually abusing the mentally handicapped

wow...

Nah, it's wrong to sexually abuse the mentally handicapped they are human and as human we give them the dignity and the rights of all other humans.

 

[TacoTerrorist]

^ They took our jerbs.

 

[Graney]

I've been wondering, why should marriage be restricted to two humans?
If we accept that a man and a horse are in a loving, consensual relationship, what is wrong with them celebrating this with a civil union?

Who are we to judge their love as somehow less worthy than that of two humans?

If the man dies, he can then be sure his horse will be looked after and receive a proper inheritance and not just be turned into pet food.

I'm not entirely sure what the legal implications of this would be...

 

[chicky_pie]

sex with a horse, I can only picture Daniel Radcliffe doing that.

 

[HNAKXR]

objective morality does not exist so no action is logically preferable to any other in regard to the moral value of one action over another.

so debating this crap is useless.

 

[Zozaline]

Agreed.

And also to some sicko in an earlier thread that said animals wouldn't suffer psychological harm... fool, of course they would- even if you are arguing that animals would not have a high enough level of thought processing they still react to physical pain and fear. What animal is not going to be scared of someone who has just raped them, and caused them physical [if not emotional] pain/abuse.

This thread is void. Just go look at some porn.

 

[HNAKXR]

Agreed.

And also to some sicko in an earlier thread that said animals wouldn't suffer psychological harm... fool, of course they would- even if you are arguing that animals would not have a high enough level of thought processing they still react to physical pain and fear. What animal is not going to be scared of someone who has just raped them, and caused them physical [if not emotional] pain/abuse.

true animals retain previous experiences e.g 'Pavlovs dog'.

This thread is void. Just go look at some porn.

hear hear.

 

[Graney]

they still react to physical pain and fear. What animal is not going to be scared of someone who has just raped them, and caused them physical [if not emotional] pain/abuse.

Msny domestic animals can accomodate quite a large penis, or can easily copulate with a human female.

It can be completely painless for all parties.

 

[HNAKXR]

Msny domestic animals can accomodate quite a large penis, or can easily copulate with a human female.

It can be completely painless for all parties.

big difference between what you can do, and what you should do.

 

[Graney]

I would accept you shouldn't do it, if it could be proven it must definetly harm any living creature.

For any ambiguous moral question, the rule of Saint Benedict said we should ask "who is harmed by this action"?

In this case, no one is harmed by this action. The sheep loves it.

 

[HNAKXR]

I would accept you shouldn't do it, if it could be proven it must definetly harm any living creature.

For any ambiguous moral question, the rule of Saint Benedict said we should ask "who is harmed by this action"?

In this case, no one is harmed by this action. The sheep loves it.

bloody New Zealander :rofl:

 

[Enteebee]

And also to some sicko in an earlier thread that said animals wouldn't suffer psychological harm... fool, of course they would- even if you are arguing that animals would not have a high enough level of thought processing they still react to physical pain and fear. What animal is not going to be scared of someone who has just raped them, and caused them physical [if not emotional] pain/abuse.

... If you can demonstrate that even most animals while being 'lovingly' played around with are in fear/physical pain then obviously I'd be against it - The point is that you can't.

 

[HNAKXR]

... If you can demonstrate that even most animals while being 'lovingly' played around with are in fear/physical pain then obviously I'd be against it - The point is that you can't.

most little critters freak the fuck out when you pick them up , let alone molest them.

 

[Enteebee]

most little critters freak the fuck out when you pick them up , let alone molest them.

and most dogs love it when you scratch their bellies, what's your point?

 

[HNAKXR]

and most dogs love it when you scratch their bellies, what's your point?

randomly molesting animals will end up with at least one party getting hurt.

 

[Graney]

It's not random, it's systematic.
A loving relationship where trust is kindly and gently developed.

 

[HNAKXR]

It's not random, it's systematic.
A loving relationship where trust is kindly and gently developed.

ok then

i was just saying you have to be on first base to get to second, Animals need to be romanced like humans :rofl:

 

[Enteebee]

er... it's not like I'm advocating people go around and just start doing things to their animals that the animals clearly don't like.

 

[HNAKXR]

er... it's not like I'm advocating people go around and just start doing things to their animals that the animals clearly don't like.

WHAt the FUck man, don't go back on the movement.