Yeah Idk... in the past I've generally held a fair bit of apathy about the whole debate, I doubt much would change. It is possible that it would spur on some more 'activist' judgements and give the courts more power which could be good/bad depending how you look at it...withoutaface said:The problem is that positive rights, by definition, interfere with far more fundamental, negative, rights of others.
but overall it matter really little imo. I don't think a bill of rights increases our rights and I just view it as another way for Rudd to have another big pronouncement.