Biology Predictions/Thoughts (2 Viewers)

[its_ace21]

but i said that we need to kill the snails-

thats the point, we love them too much we have to kill them

 

[itsalovehaterelo]

also we love snails

anyone who said nuke the snails is gonna get shat on by nesa im calling it cos nesa loves #biodiversity

 

[SadCeliac]

I HATED THAT QUESTION OMGGGGG

For part a) I said that it was the substitution of a base pair (point mutation)
not frameshift lol

 

[synthesisFR]

kys. its legit 1 mark GO TO SLEEP MAD

I’m jk sorry

 

[SadCeliac]

anyone who said nuke the snails is gonna get shat on by nesa im calling it cos nesa loves #biodiversity

are your estimates in your signature raw predictions or aligned???

 

[Unovan]

I HATED THAT QUESTION OMGGGGG

It looked complicated but it was literally just nesa saying a point mutation in the most convuluted way they could possibly conjure up


Also who let NESA cook up the literal worst epidemiological study of all time?

 

[its_ace21]

It looked complicated but it was literally just nesa saying a point mutation in the most convuluted way they could possibly conjure up


Also who let NESA cook up the literal worst epidemiological study of all time?

TAKE THAT BACK. THE ONLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY I LIKE

 

[SadCeliac]

THERE IS SUCH A FAT FLY IN MY ROOM WTAF

 

[Unovan]

TAKE THAT BACK. THE ONLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY I LIKE

That study had 0 redeeming qualities I was just shitting on it for two pages straight

 

[SadCeliac]

guys im hopping threads to go plan chem bye enjoy ranting about the bio test that we all got 90 raw in <3

 

[its_ace21]

That study had 0 redeeming qualities I was just shitting on it for two pages straight

it was so easy tf

 

[year10studentpreparin]

For part a) I said that it was the substitution of a base pair (point mutation)
not frameshift lol

i did point mutation and yeah put subsitution in brackets
I was just wondering how the part b was 4 marks so I just made sure to include what frameshift mutations would do to proteins

 

[Masaken]

Also who let NESA cook up the literal worst epidemiological study of all time?

bro i was roasting that epidemiological study to hell like imagine only having 500 people in ur study

 

[its_ace21]

bro i was roasting that epidemiological study to hell like imagine only having 500 people in ur study

for 1 year as well bro get a life and do smth better

 

[Unovan]

i did point mutation and yeah put subsitution in brackets
I was just wondering how the part b was 4 marks so I just made sure to include what frameshift mutations would do to proteins

I talked about what would happen if it was a nonsense, missense or silent so ended up writing like a page and a half lmao

 

[TankKuno]

2n=114

the actual 2n of the geep is 57, apparently

 

[Unovan]

the actual 2n of the geep is 57, apparently

facebook discussion group is just all obsessing with fucking geeps

what a fucked up animal how could you ever look at that thing with anything other than hatred and disgust for its mere existence

 

[synthesisFR]

Yes bc since when did gametes become diploid? It has to be 57

 

[its_ace21]

facebook discussion group is just all obsessing with fucking geeps

what a fucked up animal how could you ever look at that thing with anything other than hatred and disgust for its mere existence

rude geep are cute

 

[SadCeliac]

I talked about what would happen if it was a nonsense, missense or silent so ended up writing like a page and a half lmao

sameeee I wrote way too fucking much and then had zero time for the seven markers

my response for the epidemiological study was literally:

THIS IS NOT A GOOD STUDY

• Small sample size (500)
• Moderate time frame (12 months) not enough to develop symptoms
• Large variety in participants (male and female within an age range of 20yrs)
• No control group
• Data is not consistent and doesn't make a clear conclusion
• Incidence is somewhat measured but it isn't clear when in the period they showed symptoms (also mortality/prevalence isn't mentioned)
• IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE
  • increase sample size to 10,000
  • get a more controlled cohort with less random variables
  • introduce a control variable like having a baseline city

AND THEN I HAD TO MOVE ON TO THE OTHER SEVEN MARKER