• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Brendan Nelson new Opposition Leader (3 Viewers)

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
zimmerman8k said:
He's the second richest, but he still can't manage money right?
His woman balances the books while he slaves away in the kitchen and drives the kids to school.
 

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Well I think he was brilliant as Education minister, he gave us VSU.

Which I suppose is unfair on non-working families :rolleyes:

That scare page has more Labor 07 campaign cliches than you can poke a stick at (without throwing a fair go out the back door)
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
zimmerman8k said:
Seing the lying fucktard loose his seat was nice, but personally I would have prefered to see him leave office in a wooden box.
Calm down
 

_dhj_

-_-
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,562
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
withoutaface said:
His background? You do realise we just elected the second richest man in parliament prime minister, right?
It's not about the net wealth but about the image he resonates. There are many insurmountable problems with that image, but they are basically caused by the fact that he's achieved too much in his life. Of course it sounds illogical, but people do not reason logically when it comes to forming impressions.
 

Nebuchanezzar

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
7,536
Location
Camden
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Schroedinger said:
Awesome man meet you on the Grassy Knoll. You're doing one for the greater good.
Well I don't believe in the eye for an eye thing myself, but he raises a valid point. The man should still be held accountable for murder while in office.
 

morganforrest

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
497
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Do we then do the same for Churchill, JFK etc....other leaders whose decision to go to war also directly cost lives??
 

Nebuchanezzar

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
7,536
Location
Camden
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Schroedinger said:
Unless you want to go and retroactively assassinate every prime minister because people have died under the watch of every single one through some form of miscommunication of governmental directive, then don't post retarded bullshit.
Miscommunication of government directive? He made a conscious decision to invade a country. That's killing, it ought to be punishable by law.

morganforrest said:
Do we then do the same for Churchill, JFK etc....other leaders whose decision to go to war also directly cost lives??
Did they invade the country at first? Did they do so for a valid reason?
 
Last edited:

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Nebuchanezzar said:
Miscommunication of government directive? He made a conscious decision to invade a country. That's killing, it ought to be punishable by law.



Did they invade the country at first? Did they do so for a valid reason?
I believe the Bay of Pigs and the bombing of Dresden would both fit the bill.
 

Nebuchanezzar

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
7,536
Location
Camden
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
withoutaface said:
I believe the Bay of Pigs and the bombing of Dresden would both fit the bill.
Was the bombing of Dresden in response to a direct threat from Hitler? Like...he was actually invading other countries and visibly massing weapons of...attack. If that's the case with Kennedy then I offer no defense for him either.
 

walrusbear

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
2,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
a shitload of people didn't need hindsight in this particular case
 

Enteebee

Keepers of the flames
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
3,091
Location
/
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Whatever, if Rudd was PM at the time we would have gone to war, the whole issue is for all practical purposes moot unless you truly supported the election of an anti-war candidate.
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
That's a pretty unfair comment considering that Labor opposed the war based on the insufficient case and public sentiment
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Iron said:
That's a pretty unfair comment considering that Labor opposed the war based on the insufficient case and public sentiment
Re-writing History, Iron? If my memory serves, the ALP supported the war (with reservations) and none more so than Kevin Rudd.
 

Nebuchanezzar

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
7,536
Location
Camden
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Enteebee said:
Whatever, if Rudd was PM at the time we would have gone to war,
Wow. Now there's a statement drenched in factual evidence! :)

the whole issue is for all practical purposes moot unless you truly supported the election of an anti-war candidate.
Which I did. I voted Greens. Nyah.
 

Nebuchanezzar

Banned
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
7,536
Location
Camden
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Schroedinger said:
Moderator and Revisionist I see. I'm fairly certain Rudd when he was Foreign Minister was for the War.

It appears the internet has been whitewashed and all of Rudd's stances are on the war retrospectively from what I can garner.
From wiki...

wikipedia re Rudd as Foreign affairs spokesman said:
In this role, he strongly criticised the Howard government over its support for the United States in the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent operations there, while maintaining Labor's position of support for the Australian-American alliance.

"Well, what Secretary Powell and the US seems to have said is that he now has grave doubts about the accuracy of the case he put to the United Nations about the claim that Iraq possessed biological weapons laboratories - the so-called mobile trailers. And here in Australia, that formed also part of the government's argument on the war. I think what it does is it adds to the fabric of how the Australian people were misled about the reasons for going to war."[14]
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Nebuchanezzar said:
From wiki...
Neb, note the date of the article/transcript listed as footnote 14.

Edit: In my previous post I should have said the invasion and to a lesser extent the war that followed, but my point still stands.

Also, for those arguing that the ALP of 2007 was/is in favour of a withdrawl from Iraq, please take note of the fact that the ALP will only be withdrawing the combat component from Iraq. The security detachment will remain (few would dispute this), as will the naval and air forces stationed in the Middle East at large.
 
Last edited:

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Parry and retaliatory slash noted, Iron, however, it would be best to remember that Labor's argument was based on the need for the issue to be dealt with by the UN, not the matter of intelligence and weapons of mass destruction.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top