BRW Top 100 Accounting Firms List (2006) (1 Viewer)

[jase_]

Full Report (~6MB):
http://rapidshare.de/files/29718443/BRWTop100Acct_Full.pdf.html

List Only (~2MB):
http://rapidshare.de/files/29718697/BRWTop100Acct_List.pdf.html

Sorry about the large file sizes. The files are in .pdf format. Post here if there are problems with the links

 

[seremify007]

Thanks

Are these taken from brw website? They switched to some new login and I haven't bothered to figure out how to use it... tried to go to brw today but it wasn't updated yet.

Bought the magazine though

Thanks again for link.

EDIT: All good. Btw just realised EY's budgeted revenue actually went down.. hmm.

 

[turtleface]

stupid fairfax they locked out their content on everything so noone can get freebies anymore

especially bad for cheapskates like me

no more brw back issues ( was available b4 for subscribers only), no CFO mag, no backdoor access of AFR articles through a Google Cached version etc. :mad1:


:burn: @ fairfax

 

[Minai]

Tee hee, that'll cause some angst at EY.

 

[turtleface]

disappointing EY.....disappointing......wheres your commitment...

 

[Archimedes]

Hi,

Does anyone know anything much about the criteria for this list? I was able to get a copy of the list on the net, and I noticed that one firm I know of wasn't listed. However, the firm has a lot more staff than some of the firms down the bottom end of the list. So it seems a bit strange that they wouldn't be generating the fees necessary to get a spot. Also, afaik the firm isn't owned by anyone else.

Just seems a bit strange.....

 

[turtleface]

Hmm sounds strange.

Is it part of the WHK group or another accounting company/consolidator? That could be the reason.

Maybe it just has really low revenue per staff member. Some tax practices like H&R Block have fairly low revenues given their staff level so that could be another factor.

 

[seremify007]

Hi,

Does anyone know anything much about the criteria for this list? I was able to get a copy of the list on the net, and I noticed that one firm I know of wasn't listed. However, the firm has a lot more staff than some of the firms down the bottom end of the list. So it seems a bit strange that they wouldn't be generating the fees necessary to get a spot. Also, afaik the firm isn't owned by anyone else.

Just seems a bit strange.....

Assuming that the budgeted fees/revenue is high enough to be on the list (as it's sorted purely by budgeted fees $m), then either it's been consolidated in another entry (some "networks" use different names for the offices around the country perhaps?), or they chose not to submit information to BRW. Remember that this survey/ranking is based on voluntary submission of revenue and other statistics.

 

[Archimedes]

AH!

That's one option- they just didn't submit their figures.