BUSL250 take home exam (1 Viewer)

[ReaveR]

Cassidy vs. The Minister is good for vicarious liability

 

[Orange Juice]

can someone explain case referencing please?

XX VS YY (1990) 111 CLR 222 at 333 per Gleeson CJ, Mchugh

what does everything after 1990 refer to?

 

[boinkBOINK]

yea thats what i used it for lol

how many words are people on?
im on about 640? and ive got NOTHING to cut out.
at this point its lookin really crap cause ive cut the whole ting out almost.
everything lefts like i dunno i cant cut =\

uhmm clr is like where its in? i think? like CLR --> criminal law review? 111 is the section?
that per gleeson or whatever is the ruling their talking about?
i THINK

 

[yenta]

so far for quesion 3 i've only found 1 case that's relevant: L. Shaddock v Parra City Council (in pg 135 of textbook). If anyone finds any others let me know!

I've done 526 words for q3, think i'll leave it at that. Far out it is SO hard to cut it down when you're over

 

[Orange Juice]

yenta how ya relating that? i was gonna use it but i found that it was stupid cuz the council lost even though they were being nice...

are you gonna say that johnny can sue the firm?

how many cases people using for q3? and is everyone gonna write that big ass paragraph at the end of the assignment?

 

[yenta]

yeah the issue in the case that i used is if the council owed a duty of care for information, or just for advice. The decision was that it did owe a duty of care for info, so im saying that john was owed a duty of care to receive the information from bing lee.

 

[yenta]

shit, are we supposed to write a full bibliography at the end along with all the footnotes? (i'm exhausted enough already!)

 

[redruM]

FUCK!

i am just about to start mine

load up the coffee

 

[ReaveR]

lol
It took me two days simply because its draining and makes you not want to do it anymore. Maybe if you keep thinking its worth 35% tonight you'll keep at it >.<

I only just finished now...

 

[redruM]

lol. i'm up for a power session

just finished part1 for question!




maybe too much to ask, but if someone can help me out by pointing me to some points of reference for the question 2 and 3, it would be awesome.

 

[boinkBOINK]

WHAT OH YEA
are we meant to do a BIBLIOGRAPHY?

 

[ReaveR]

For 2 look around p41
And 3 read Civil Liabilties Act =p
And look anywhere from page 110-139 for the particular cases

Edit: And I didn't do a bibliography, although I bet we need to do one.

 

[Skittled]

No bibliography. Just footnotes, according to the question sheet.

Good luck, everyone!

 

[redruM]

lol

i got it done. pretty decent effort considering the work i have done for buslaw and the amount of time i spent on the assigment.

big thanks to anyone who posted anything in this thread. helped out heaps!

 

[- H -]

Results Are Available!

Deary me, results are in and they aren't great. Highest was 32 and lowest was 0 - from what i could see. Average was something like 21.6

Anyone disappointed? I sure am.


The statement of claim exercise - did anyone pass that without relating the case to torts?

 

[Orange Juice]

argh fuck... i guess im happy with what i got...

how do we see individual marks?

 

[pb]

ahhh pooey i did pretty bad

at least i passed... and at least i kinda beat the average

and for statement of claims, i didnt say anything about torts i dont think... the first time i didnt pass and i had to resubmit. i resubmitted the same thing and i passed lol.. yay

 

[*hopeful*]

is there individual marks posted ? cuz the stupid file wont d/l onto my comp

 

[ReaveR]

Try getting it from here.
I'm happy with my results.

 

[MaryJane]

13 students got 0! I cant believe that, why even be at uni if you're not going to do the work? My darling Skittled did fantastically (I'm gushing for him because he's too modest!).