Capitalism or Communism? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

sarevok

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
853
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
A lot of people say that 'communism works in theory, but not in practice' but I would say it is very flawed in both. As human beings, we need the ability to achieve and to be rewarded for it. A total redistribution of wealth eradicates the mechanism of exchange by which merit is sanctioned and supported. I cannot understand why anyone would desire this even in a theoretical sense. Achieving things brings a lot of satisfaction and meaning to my life.

Saying you are a communist now is like declaring that you are a Scientologist. Funny to think that 50 years ago this absurd belief system was actually a threat to our way of life.
 

dieburndie

Eat, Sleep, Repeat
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
971
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
sarevok said:
A lot of people say that 'communism works in theory, but not in practice' but I would say it is very flawed in both.
I never really understood the statement at all. Can't any problem with a political system's practical application be attributed in some way to the theory supporting it? I think a lot of people misinterpret the word theory also, similar to the whole 'evolution is only a theory' type thing.
 

Matt1120

Basically a History Nerd
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
206
Location
Werombi (try to work out where that is)
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
sarevok said:
. A total redistribution of wealth eradicates the mechanism of exchange by which merit is sanctioned and supported. I cannot understand why anyone would desire this even in a theoretical sense.
Thing is, marx believed that greed and this drive to be rewarded is the result of society structured around classes. marx believed that if you eradicated the classes then greed would disapear
 

Foxodi

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
308
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I would imagine or prefer a system that is a balance between communism and capitalism.

I despise capitalism because it creates an environment where humans get too involved in their work, exploiting people, breeds greed etc. Ultimately I think capitalism creates an anti-social environment.

Also theres my belief that communism would be a much more effective method for creating wealth (I still dont see why government enterprises cant be made effecient), and theres the obvious distribution of wealth which will add value (however I think the positive effects of wealth distribution will be canceled out by the fact that more money will be spent then what is currently being spent, which will increase inflation to its true levels...)

A combination involving an open market (to regulate efficiency, pricing etc), with everything principally being owned by the government (to increase business activity, synergy effects etc). Then with a moderate wage distribution (prob similar to today's wages really, just with a wage cap of 1million or something...)

Then I'd the benefits of that system and put that into establishing social services (with a major emphasis on education)

I found some ideas similar to mine on wikipedia once, I cant find it right now but I think it was called something like "Middle Way" or something...
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Matt1120 said:
Yes it is. But the dictatorship should let go of their power..but they dont becoauses humans are naturally greedy
How do you account for our freedoms then? The colony of NSW was basically an autocracy. I think that perceived threat is more important than our supposed (and bs) evil default settings.
Isnt the history of the dark, cruel and paranoid slavs a better explanation?
 

ccc123

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
760
Location
In the backwaters of Cherrybrook
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Captain Gh3y said:
Your view of Communism is too much coloured by your own experience and not by the research literature which suggests that everyone would be better off under Communism.
No but, like, isn't that the inherent flaw of communism? That in literature and academic dissertation etc etc: i.e in an essentially theoretical sense people would be better off under communism, only that when someone actually attempts to implement it, it degenerates into an equally repressive regime?
 

ccc123

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
760
Location
In the backwaters of Cherrybrook
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
fantabulous said:
Meh. Communism was never influential anyway
Um, Early C20th, the communist school of thought permeated global
consciousness. It was a very influential ideology. If it weren't, I can assure you the Chinese and Russian would not have attempted to implement it, and the Americans certainly wouldn't have been so apprehensive of it.
 
Last edited:

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
FACT: The existence of capitalism relies on the ignorance and material obsession of the great masses of people.

If everyone were more educated, materialism and profit-driven chaos would give way to superior values such as equity, equality and fairness. This would naturally lead to a system based on Socialism.

Ever wondered why the government continually under-funds education? EXACTLY.
 

bigboyjames

Banned
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
1,265
Location
aus
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
both have the ups and down. but democracy sold out to capitalism years back. im not a fan of both but looking at what the world is comming to ill say communism.
 

Foxodi

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
308
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
zimmerman8k said:
It's called a mixed market economy. Its what we have in Australia today. No country in the world is a pure example of either communism or capitalism.
Mm, what I have in mind is abit more extreme I think. I mean for all business's assets to be ultimately owned by the government, in an efficient and competitive system; with the main aim of introducing competition when needed (and reducing it when needed... 100 generic companies to do the same thing is a waste of productivity imo..) Also it enables the government to coordinate co operation between the compeating sectors/groups etc, to increase synergy effects.

Also the wage should have a cap of 250k or so, and only goes over slightly in cases of extremely rare ability.

And much much more emphasis on education :D Replace all basic functions with automated machines and encourage the masses of the unemployed to go back to education, so more people have higher-thinking skills, allowing for the economy to grow further? Just my thoughts anyway.
 

Foxodi

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
308
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
bigboyjames said:
both have the ups and down. but democracy sold out to capitalism years back. im not a fan of both but looking at what the world is comming to ill say communism.
Haha yea, its kinda sad now, the word democracy seems to have the same meaning as capitalism these days.... curse America and its idea's; It's only a matter of time before their system collapses imo.
 

bassistx

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
985
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
I can't bother to read through all the posts in here, but if somebody hasn't pointed it out already, Communism, apart from being an economic system, is actually a political system (in reference to the first post). You can seach google or whatever if you want.

In any case, that member's dead. So they shouldn't care lol.

Communism > Capitalism

EDIT: Gh3y, Socialism and Communism may have their similarities but they're still quite different from each other. Communism is basically the "final level" - Socialism is the lead up to Communism. It's still quite liberal.
 
Last edited:

^CoSMic DoRiS^^

makes the woosh noises
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
5,274
Location
middle of nowhere
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
Foxodi said:
Haha yea, its kinda sad now, the word democracy seems to have the same meaning as capitalism these days.... curse America and its idea's; It's only a matter of time before their system collapses imo.
it's only a matter of time before the sun burns out and the world ends. nothing lasts forever. what's your point?
 

_dhj_

-_-
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,562
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
We're gonna get socialism one way or the other.

Eventually we'll all be using one product (such as the ipod) or one website (youtube or whatever dominates). Product differentiation then collapses and we'll all live happily ever after in the end of history.
 

Matt1120

Basically a History Nerd
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
206
Location
Werombi (try to work out where that is)
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
_dhj_ said:
We're gonna get socialism one way or the other.

Eventually we'll all be using one product (such as the ipod) or one website (youtube or whatever dominates). Product differentiation then collapses and we'll all live happily ever after in the end of history.
it wont last forever, people will want to overthrow the dictator and it will become mob rule
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top