unofficiallyred12
Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2021
- Messages
- 89
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2023
but ye my teacher said such questions aren't likely to come up in hsc cos could be controversial
I don't know how you gotThe problem with the approach from @blob063540 arises from the initial transformation of the integrand
It is true when lies in quadrant 1, but not when it is in quadrant 3 (because sine and cosine are negative whereas the tangent function is positive). The integrand itself is not defined in quadrants 2 or 4.
It arises because only when . MX2 students should be aware that
A closed form that does work for all in the domain of the integrand is then
Interestingly, given the discussion above, this integrated form is defined for all real , though it is not differentiable for any integer multiple of pi on 2. The function's behaviour in the second and fourth quadrants does not have meaning in terms of the original integral.
The form I derived earlier, that
is defined only when , as are the form from @member 6003's approach, that
The final form has used which is accurate in this case as the presence of in the denominator ensures that the domain is restricted to when . Thus, formally, the reasoning is:
Any of the forms presented here is valid. There is no problem with member 6003's approach or working, in my view.
Yes, another approach is to express the integral as piece-wise defined:I don't know how you got
it looks wrong in desmos.
I'll list what did to resolve the problem with blob's answer
This step is actually valid since the integrand implies sinx, cosx have the same sign, if they're both negative then it will cancel under the square root so you can use the property which doesn't work for complex numbers.
since we know that sinx and cosx are either both positive or negative:
case 1 is for
you get
case 2 is for
you get
interestingly enough you don't have to apply both restrictions only one of them because of the restrictions of inverse sine. You can try to combine the two cases using the sign function but then you get zeroes where there shouldn't be in the case that sinx or cosx=0