oh aight I was being a little paranoid but if its just a mass spec suuurely I didnt make some buggin mistake or some shitYou were given a mass spec and asked which produced the peak at 43 or something
oh aight I was being a little paranoid but if its just a mass spec suuurely I didnt make some buggin mistake or some shitYou were given a mass spec and asked which produced the peak at 43 or something
Ohhhhh. I don't remember which letter I chose but it was the one where the + was on the first ion because that was what was detectedYou were given a mass spec and asked which produced the peak at 43 or something
i think there's a mistake in their solution to 31, the graph is skewed in that scan so they accidentally drew the line down to 0.044 instead of 0.046solutions from conquer to the scuffed incomplete paper
It was the acetic acid and trichloroacetic acid questionAnyone recall Q32-35 pre three of them were the piston eq graph shit, Mg2+ calc and the titration but literally recollection of the other one
Yeah I got 0.046 and got like 1.3x10^4i think there's a mistake in their solution to 31, the graph is skewed in that scan so they accidentally drew the line down to 0.044 instead of 0.046
i showed that it reacts with OH to form NH3 and water which is basically showing the same thingDissociates into NH4+ which donates proton to water and there is B-L acid.
ye ik lmao i think whoever made these solutions basically was just speedrunning tf outta the exam but yeah it should be 0.046i think there's a mistake in their solution to 31, the graph is skewed in that scan so they accidentally drew the line down to 0.044 instead of 0.046
that seems familiar but I dont remember the context of the question lmaoIt was the acetic acid and trichloroacetic acid question
Part (a) was finding Ka of dichloroacetic acid and part (b) was using gibbs energy and Ka values to explain the difference in strength of the acidsthat seems familiar but I dont remember the context of the question lmao
Yeah. The same ones I put in post#397. PEAK's is the same as Roy Fu'sPEAK solutions
mb didn’t realiseYeah. The same ones I put in post#397. PEAK's is the same as Roy Fu's
That's OK. Maybe you didn't know PEAK's is the same as Roy Fu's.mb didn’t realise
They didn't. They probably just used a paper paper.How did they do full solutions with the scuffed scan?