nerdasdasd
Dont.msg.me.about.english
Too ambiguous?As far as I know there is no right answer
The only way to have a definite answer is to use brackets throughout
i.e. (6÷2)(1+2) or 6÷(2(1+2))
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
Too ambiguous?As far as I know there is no right answer
The only way to have a definite answer is to use brackets throughout
i.e. (6÷2)(1+2) or 6÷(2(1+2))
The convention is start with brackets and go outwards iirc. Then BODMAS.Yes because BODMAS for multiplication and division should always go from left to right.
But the real question is. Why?
How can you 'prove' BODMAS?
Yep pretty much this, multiplication by juxtaposition.A number of people are quoting rules that don't exist.
For example "always DO brackets first". That rule is to always EVALUATE the contents of brackets first. It seems 'DO' has been substituted here to justify why the neighbouring multiplication should be evaluated before the division. One of many cases where imprecise language causes confusion.
The fact is that using a dot to represent multiplication, or using no operator at all, takes a higher precedence than the multiplication symbol. I don't think that there is a rule here, and I don't believe anyone has made such an edict. But that is the way years of convention seems to have settled the matter.
If the × was shown then you would have evaluated from left to right. It has nothing to do with 'doing' brackets first (whatever that was designed to mean), or 'starting with brackets and going outwards'.