Conics help - eccentricity when a<b (1 Viewer)

iPhone4

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
167
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hi everyone, for a regular hyperbola with x^2/a^2 -y^2/b^2 = 1,

When a<b, what is the formula to find eccentricity?

Is it the same when a>b?

Usually we use:

b^2=a^2(e^2-1) for a>b.

For a<b, do we use

a^2 = b^2 (e^2-1)?

Likewise for the ellipse, we use:

b^2=a^2 (1-e^2) for a>b

For a<b, do we now use

a^2=b^2 (e^2 -1)?

Thanks (hope this isnt too confusing)
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hyperbolas do not work the same as ellipses in this respect.

The orientation of the ellipse depends on which is larger, a or b.

The orientation of the hyperbola depends on whether x^2/a^2 -y^2/b^2 is equal to positive or negative 1. The relative sizes of a and b do not affect the orientation.

So with the ellipse you switch to the alternate eccentricity formula when b>a.
With the hyperbola you switch to the alternate eccentricity formula when the RHS is -1 (or the terms are subtracted the other way around).

So here you use the normal eccentricity formula.
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Hyperbolas do not work the same as ellipses in this respect.

The orientation of the ellipse depends on which is larger, a or b.

The orientation of the hyperbola depends on whether x^2/a^2 -y^2/b^2 is equal to positive or negative 1. The relative sizes of a and b do not affect the orientation.

So with the ellipse you switch to the alternate eccentricity formula when b>a.
With the hyperbola you switch to the alternate eccentricity formula when the RHS is -1 (or the terms are subtracted the other way around).

So here you use the normal eccentricity formula.
can they/do they ever ask questions on the alternate hyperbola?
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I don't recall ever seeing one. Not sure whether they can though.
they could probably chuck one in, ask you to graph it and claim that it fits in under graphs/transforming known curves or something
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top