CSSA Paper 2 (1 Viewer)

[spanky125]

Made up both my ORT's on the spot, I was that unmotivated to study that I couldn't even come up with fake names in my own time. So in my exam I made up Sebastian Vetberg, combination of Sebastian Vettel and Nico Rosberg (F1 drivers).
Hope the marker doesn't watch too much F1! haha

 

[iBibah]

thats for slessor and HAHAHA omg lolllll if five visions was specified!!!

Yeh it said something about referring to two poems, including 5 visions of captian cook, .............

 

[Makematics]

Yeh it said something about referring to two poems, including 5 visions of captian cook, .............

wow two poems? thats even worse, i thought it was usually one max?!? lol if the other one was sensuality or something

 

[CloudDeter]

Made up both my ORT's on the spot, I was that unmotivated to study that I couldn't even come up with fake names in my own time. So in my exam I made up Sebastian Vetberg, combination of Sebastian Vettel and Nico Rosberg (F1 drivers).
Hope the marker doesn't watch too much F1! haha

Haha what a way to bs your essay! xD

 

[iBibah]

wow two poems? thats even worse, i thought it was usually one max?!? lol if the other one was sensuality or something

Second one wasn't specified iirc

 

[Queenroot]

Which speech was specified? Sadat/Keating?

^ Yeah, would love to know if they specified any speeches. Good ol' independent paper...
Anyone know?

It was Atwood. Out of all the speeches that's the one I had the least understanding of. Hence shitty thesis.

Also has anyone realised the trials have all been about complexities/choice?

 

[Buzz Lightyear]

I personally thought the questions on FrankieBlade, Hamlet, and the 50th Gate were fairly reasonable. I was surprised by how many people thought the Hamlet question was ridiculous. I thought it was pretty generic.

 

[iBibah]

I personally thought the questions on FrankieBlade, Hamlet, and the 50th Gate were fairly reasonable. I was surprised by how many people thought the Hamlet question was ridiculous. I thought it was pretty generic.

+2

 

[albertcamus]

It was Atwood. Out of all the speeches that's the one I had the least understanding of. Hence shitty thesis.

Also has anyone realised the trials have all been about complexities/choice?

Hahaha oh I love atwood

But damn it HSC probs wont specify it

 

[procrastinator2]

i hated it all :S does no-one else feel the same way :L
- fra-bla
- yeats
- 50th gate

 

[iBibah]

i hated it all :S does no-one else feel the same way :L
- fra-bla
- yeats
- 50th gate

Curious, what type of FRANKENBLADE question would make it better/easier?

 

[albertcamus]

Curious, what type of FRANKENBLADE question would make it better/easier?

what was cssa q.?

 

[Siddy123]

Curious, what type of FRANKENBLADE question would make it better/easier?

the question may as well have said:
" Throughout the duration of your course, you have studied texts in time and how context shapes values. A week ago, you memorised a generic essay. Please regurgitate ."

 

[Siddy123]

what was cssa q.?

how context/form shape values

 

[albertcamus]

how context/form shape values

they said differences in form specifically?

 

[iBibah]

what was cssa q.?

how context/form shape values

Yeh this, I honestly couldn't see it being any easier. Not that I pumped it (which I didn't) but that's not because of a bad question.

 

[Siddy123]

they said differences in form specifically?

dont remember tbh
some1 pls confirm

 

[iBibah]

they said differences in form specifically?

I think it was, 'how context shapes values and form'.

 

[albertcamus]

I think it was, 'how context shapes values and form'.

hmm form part is a bit weird but its pretty much how romantic and gothic conventions inspired such imagery for shelley and values is anything

and for scott --> corporate blah influenced depiction of the skyscrapers visually appealing way allows him to highlight his contextual criticisms more probs something like that - a bit surprised though cos a tad easier than i would have thought

 

[Buzz Lightyear]

I remember some specifically about how 'context powerfully shapes values and form'

Very very generic imo.