difficulty of the first year math exams (1 Viewer)

[walla]

oh come on guys don't just accept keypad's "proofs" like that!!

keypad was responding to:
"there's always gonna b ppl. better than u" where "u" was "xiao1985". keypad merely proved that "someone" was the best. He in no way even attempted to prove that xiao1985 was the best, which was required to disprove freaking_out's "stupid stupid statement". geez!

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
You dolt, if you remove God from the set, the theorem still holds.

yeah well that is a big "IF"...

Originally posted by walla
oh come on guys don't just accept keypad's "proofs" like that!!

keypad was responding to:
"there's always gonna b ppl. better than u" where "u" was "xiao1985". keypad merely proved that "someone" was the best. He in no way even attempted to prove that xiao1985 was the best, which was required to disprove freaking_out's "stupid stupid statement". geez!

ahhh....thank god for lawyers.

 

[walla]

 

[KeypadSDM]

Originally posted by walla
oh come on guys don't just accept keypad's "proofs" like that!!

keypad was responding to:
"there's always gonna b ppl. better than u" where "u" was "xiao1985". keypad merely proved that "someone" was the best. He in no way even attempted to prove that xiao1985 was the best, which was required to disprove freaking_out's "stupid stupid statement". geez!

You dolt.

I was saying that you can't just say "There's always someone better" to everyone.

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
You dolt.

I was saying that you can't just say "There's always someone better" to everyone.

no, i was reffering to humans...i.e when i said that "there are always gonna b ppl. betta than you " i was reffering reffering to human beings obviously- i.e any human u find, u'll always have someone better than him, and if that is not from the human beings themselves, then its god himself.

i can't believe that we fighting ova such trivial things.

 

[KeypadSDM]

You're being a douche.

God doesn't necessarly exist, humans do. Hence you're only referring to humans.

Seriously, you're wrong, just accept it.

 

[walla]

it seemed pretty targeted at xiao to me, not a generalised comment "to everyone". hence your generalised case proves nothing.

 

[KeypadSDM]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
That's a stupid stupid statement.

Theorem: In a finite set every element is less than another element. (I.e. there's always someone better than you, the lesser element).

Disproof: Order the elements from best to worst.

Pick the best element.

There is no better element than it.

Hence theorem is incorrect.

Q.E.D.



You dolt.

That's all I said.

It's not even targeted at Xiao. If anything it would have been targeted at me.

Oh wait, it's targeted at ANY SET AT ALL.

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
You're being a douche.

God doesn't necessarly exist, humans do. Hence you're only referring to humans.

Seriously, you're wrong, just accept it.

not the existence of god debate again.

Originally posted by walla
it seemed pretty targeted at xiao to me, not a generalised comment "to everyone". hence your generalised case proves nothing.

yeah, i was really talking to xiao and also the statement can apply to u as well keypad.

 

[xiao1985]

Originally posted by walla
it seemed pretty targeted at xiao to me, not a generalised comment "to everyone". hence your generalised case proves nothing.

=p blehz??? does that mean that his specific proof proved somehting??

 

[KeypadSDM]

Originally posted by xiao1985
=p blehz??? does that mean that his specific proof proved somehting??

No, it means that walla deliberately misread what I wrote so he could be right.

 

[walla]

No, it means that you get confused easily.

"It's not even targeted at Xiao. If anything it would have been targeted at me."

you're comment wasn't aimed at xiao, freaking_out's was.
just because SOMEONE will be the best doesn't mean that xiao will be.

 

[xiao1985]

ARGH!!!! spare me wif the logic already... my brain is twisted already due to the freggin maths 1901 and maths 1902... pffttt... dun understand like 40% of the stuff... =(

 

[KeypadSDM]

Originally posted by walla
No, it means that you get confused easily.

"It's not even targeted at Xiao. If anything it would have been targeted at me."

you're comment wasn't aimed at xiao, freaking_out's was.
just because SOMEONE will be the best doesn't mean that xiao will be.

I was just telling freaking_out that you can't just say that to someone arbitratily.

For all we know Xiao may be the best, until we prove otherwise.

You must first prove someone is better than you before you can apply that statement.

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
I was just telling freaking_out that you can't just say that to someone arbitratily.

For all we know Xiao may be the best, until we prove otherwise.

You must first prove someone is better than you before you can apply that statement.

yes, but even if xiao was the best- then he will still have someone better than him- i.e god!! thats what i was putting forward.

 

[walla]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
I was just telling freaking_out that you can't just say that to someone arbitratily.

For all we know Xiao may be the best, until we prove otherwise.

You must first prove someone is better than you before you can apply that statement.

Accepted. Finally some common ground

 

[KeypadSDM]

Originally posted by freaking_out
yes, but even if xiao was the best- then he will still have someone better than him- i.e god!! thats what i was putting forward.

Again, this assertion that someone is better than him must be proven.

You have to first prove that God exists, an unachievable goal.

 

[CM_Tutor]

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
You have to first prove that God exists, an unachievable goal.

Unless you have a babel fish, of course ...

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by walla
Accepted. Finally some common ground

hehe, darn- i was looking forward to the moment that u brought back ya old avatar. :rofl:

Originally posted by KeypadSDM
Again, this assertion that someone is better than him must be proven.

You have to first prove that God exists, an unachievable goal.

i can easily prove that god exists- its common sense...anyways, i don't wanna start on this thread.

 

[xiao1985]

Originally posted by freaking_out
i can easily prove that god exists- its common sense...anyways, i don't wanna start on this thread.

*shivers...

is it(since we can't really say god is human) lookin at us right now???