Hajime
Member
But I do agree with your idea that they can be put together.Hajime said:Now isn't that a little harsh? They are trying to discuss this... Failing on an agreement... But trying nonetheless!
But I do agree with your idea that they can be put together.Hajime said:Now isn't that a little harsh? They are trying to discuss this... Failing on an agreement... But trying nonetheless!
Yes, but you teach them... Not criticise.Miles Edgeworth said:But it's shit like that that leads to a misrepresentation and then allows creos to attempt to find 'flaws' in evolutionary processes.
It's just noise that detracts from the discussion
I didnt explainMiles Edgeworth said:Holy fuck there are retards on both sides of this argument not representing science and evolution correctly.
What is the go.
Evolution isn't more likely because it's 'finitely complex' evolution is an examined and extrapolated method of natural development.
*facepalm*
Occam's Razor disproves nothing. It states that, all other factors being equal, we should accept the simpler theory. It says absolutely nothing about which theory is the correct one.mophead said:Occams Razor disproves god
An omnipotent being is simple in theory but infinitly complex in practice. Evolution is finitly complex
therefore Evolution more likely
And if he does exists then why do we see upside down?? that makes no sense! he desinged us so the we see upside down and then have to interpret it as right side up? oh yeah, thats an all knowing and all good being
And where am i not representing science correctly??Miles Edgeworth said:Holy fuck there are retards on both sides of this argument not representing science and evolution correctly.
What is the go.
Evolution isn't more likely because it's 'finitely complex' evolution is an examined and extrapolated method of natural development.
*facepalm*
And i never said i was against evolution, i just said that there is little to no conclusive proof.Fr33Lanc3r said:And where am i not representing science correctly??
Which is entirely incorrect.Fr33Lanc3r said:And i never said i was against evolution, i just said that there is little to no conclusive proof.
I like the bringing of proven logic into the agrument.mophead said:Occams Razor says that the all things being equal the simplest one is more likely
all im saying, is that God is the least likely circumstance
Conclusive, experimental evidence.Kwayera said:Which is entirely incorrect.
also, i'm not saying evolution is evil. I am one of the fringe elements that can agree to the fact that God may have used Evolution as a part of the creation process. There are many things that people pass off in the early chapters of Genisis as fact, while they may be symbolic.Kwayera said:Warrior of "evil"ution
You really can't see the forest for the trees, can't you?Fr33Lanc3r said:Conclusive, experimental evidence.
No-one has witnessed evolution in progress, fossils have not proven anything conclusive thus far, and there are no other methods that have been clearly defined to me.
There was, but some bitch flicked the switch on the computer halfway through typeing cause they didn't want me on the computer.undalay said:So no reply to me proposal that an omnipotent god and free will cannot exist?
In which case the symbolism is entirely flawed and thus pointless as an "analogy".Fr33Lanc3r said:also, i'm not saying evolution is evil. I am one of the fringe elements that can agree to the fact that God may have used Evolution as a part of the creation process. There are many things that people pass off in the early chapters of Genisis as fact, while they may be symbolic.
I am a christian. I beleive in God's infinite power and wisdom. I also don't think that he micromanages the universe. Thus, he allows us free will, but still has a plan for the way our lives should turn out. He knows whether or not it does, but doesn't force us to follow it.mophead said:time is infinte, earths timeline, not so much,
and you, like so many others, fail to grasp concept of infinit. as in without end.
the gods of the three monotheisms and more besides are all supposed to be inifinte as opposed to everything else.
Look, Uluru. Seems infinite. Hasnt changed in all this time. But its not infinte and it has changed. its apperance doesnt refelct its actuality
same with evolution. I cant grasp it fully. i get the basics but just how many subspecies and random mutations....escapes me. doesnt mean it is infnite. God is infinite. ask any christian jew muslim shintoist.....etc