NO.
The Evidence for Evolution is overwhelming.
Evolution by natural selection, the central concept of the life's work of Charles Darwin, is a theory. It's a theory about the origin of adaptation, complexity, and diversity among Earth's living creatures. If you are skeptical by nature, unfamiliar with the terminology of science, and unaware of the overwhelming evidence, you might even be tempted to say that it's "just" a theory. In the same sense, relativity as decribed by Albert Einstein is "just" a theory. The notion that Earth orbits around the sun rather than vice versa, offered by Copernicus in 1543, is a theory. Continental drift is a theory. The existence, structure, and dynamics of atoms? Atomic Theory. Even electricity is a theoretical construct, involving electrons, which are tiny units of charged mass that no one has ever seen. Each of these theories is an explanation that has been confirmed to such a degree, by observation and experiment, that knowledgable experts accept it as fact. That's what scientists mean when they talk about a theory: not a dreamy and unreliable speculation, but explanatory statements that fits the evidence. They embrace such an explanation confidently, but profisionally taking it as their best available view of reality, at least until some severly conflicting data or some better explanation might come along.
Not mine, recent National geographic. For all thoose who like to think that anything labeled a theory is just plain wrong.
