vanush
kdslkf
I disagree.ScottyG said:
In class, I dislike when people when they come up some interpretation which is most likely WRONG in all aspects, and the teacher has to waste time patronizing them. It sucks.
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
english becomes mechanical (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter tobiascockerill
- Start date
In class, I dislike when people when they come up some interpretation which is most likely WRONG in all aspects, and the teacher has to waste time patronizing them. It sucks.
I discovered this a long time ago.. theres no point risking your hsc trying to come up with something original, What if the teacher marking it doesnt agree? Then you're screwed. Its best to just agree with the teachers, write down whatever they say and throw in a few quotes backing up THERE ideas and opinions.
shinji
Is in A State Of Trance
as long as u back up ur thesis with enough textual evidence, they shouldn't mark you down, no matter if they don't like it or not.Monstar said:
but if ur completely off on a different tangent, then they have the capacity to mark you down for it.
All in all, support ur arguement with enough textual references to gain the marks you want.
vanush
kdslkf
No. I dislike wasting time. (The irony of being on this site kills me)
There's a difference between a valid interpretation and nonsense.
There's a difference between a valid interpretation and nonsense.
tobiascockerill
New Member
With this thread, i was suggesting that all this 'backing up your thesis with textual evidence allows you to be 'creative' ' stuff is merely disguising the fact that the english markers and system dosent want original ideas. if something is original, it should'nt have any evidence, it has come out of the deep blue.
vanush
kdslkf
As I see it, the courses in their current incarnation are at best a compromise between the development of English Skills (grammar & expression) and the study of English literature (textual analysis & discussion).
In my personal opinion, they should split them up, especially for those (god help them) who have absolutely no interest in reading/literature.
You can be creative on more than one level. Use an idea, and write it in a different way. That's how people get Band 6's.
In my personal opinion, they should split them up, especially for those (god help them) who have absolutely no interest in reading/literature.
That's silly. Here's my new interpretation: Hamlet is a homo. Are you suggesting I get marks for this without evidence?
You can be creative on more than one level. Use an idea, and write it in a different way. That's how people get Band 6's.
Last edited: