glycerine said:
From what I hear, ext history is more work than ee2. Especially because it actually has an exam and classwork. Ee2 just involves writing a major work and reflection statement (that's your external 'exam') and for internals doing 3 works to reflect on your progress - proposal, vive voce and report. So basically, it involves spending a year writing a piece and doing internal assessments to reflect on it.
This could be a very subjective issue. Personally, having attempted both EE2 and Ext hist, I found EE2 exhausting. The pressure to do well in ee2 was MUCH higher (in my case) than the pressure from hist ext. But this, of course, varies from school to school. The case study is marked internally in ext hist, so alot of pressure or lack of) comes from your teacher. Also, the Major essay for ext hist is only 2500 words. No reflection statement. I dont like calling it a major work, because it really isnt that. It's just a research essay. The standards and difficulty (this is limiting the discussion to the Major work/essay) for EE2, in general is much higher IMO.
Then the other components of Ext hist come into play. the case study can either make you love et hist to death or hate the bloody subject. So make sure, you check which case study you will be doing before picking up the subject. If you HATE HATE modern, then JFK or the Appeasement wont go down very well
Historiography is also boring to some people. It's isnt like learning history in yr 7-10 or even yr 11 and 12 ancient or modern. Finding out about the actual work should makes things clearer rather than hearing individual stories from certain students.