General Thoughts: Biology (2 Viewers)

[emmkayyez]

No immune response... no monohybrid crosses... no Darwinish/Wallace theory questions... no DETAILED xylem/phloem questions... no non-infectious disease questions... This clearly was not a Biology exam, BOS trolled us. I'm looking at a 55-69/100.

This.

 

[RishBonjour]

This.

but everything was from the syllabus. hence a valid biology test. Except that smoking crap and data analysis things, don't know how that fits into the course.

 

[Nuggos]

but everything was from the syllabus. hence a valid biology test. Except that smoking crap and data analysis things, don't know how that fits into the course.

"gather, process and analyse information to identify the cause and effect relationship of smoking and lung cancer"

 

[RishBonjour]

"gather, process and analyse information to identify the cause and effect relationship of smoking and lung cancer"

awwwwwwwww shietttt. thats tested so heavily, never knew.

 

[Safraaz]

"gather, process and analyse information to identify the cause and effect relationship of smoking and lung cancer"

But didnt it say refer to the methology... what i did was critically analyse their method and give reasons to why its valid and reliable etc... also how they can improve their reliability...

 

[danaaxo]

it was okay but i seriously hated the genetics code broken option!

 

[Safraaz]

Btw what did people draw in the first circle for meiosis?... was it crossing over or independent assortment?