jackleung34
Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2014
- Messages
- 74
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2015
you're*your right. unconditional is just aid for no specific purpose
you're*your right. unconditional is just aid for no specific purpose
rite*you're*
your rite of passage is to tafe.rite*
he meant it as in your rite of passage, as in ferry pass to the correct answer duh
1v1 me lidcombe station ur best 10 boiz my best 10 boiz no guns no knives no nothing just fists.your rite of passage is to tafe.
fuck off. i'm a lone wolf. me v all your lil bitches pussy.1v1 me lidcombe station ur best 10 boiz my best 10 boiz no guns no knives no nothing just fists.
come on ladies, lets settle this the old fashioned way. 1v1 on rust no scope intervention onlyfuck off. i'm a lone wolf. me v all your lil bitches pussy.
bruh y dunt we take it backz to Crash WIF our M40A3'scome on ladies, lets settle this the old fashioned way. 1v1 on rust no scope intervention only
sik way of saying uve got no m9s, nwz ill rek u by myselffuck off. i'm a lone wolf. me v all your lil bitches pussy.
1v1 Atari pong turnerloos ill rek ucome on ladies, lets settle this the old fashioned way. 1v1 on rust no scope intervention only
i've got mates. I just dont need them to hold my hand wherever i go.. but it's cute that you've got "m9s". Do they help you make hecticsandwiches too? That's sweetsik way of saying uve got no m9s, nwz ill rek u by myself
Some said it will be similar to last year at around 85? (Give or take 1 or 2 marks up or down?)anyone predict a band 6 cut off?
BB don't cut me like that, I thought we had something special </3i've got mates. I just dont need them to hold my hand wherever i go.. but it's cute that you've got "m9s". Do they help you make hecticsandwiches too? That's sweet
I think that's fine. I kind of took the similar direction as you did, i.e. fiscal consolidation for fiscal policy (which pretty much ties into contractionary fiscal policy), but for monetary policy I ended up concluding that it's generally ineffective. Nevertheless, if the quality and structure of your exposition is great and you've exhibited enough economic understanding/content, then you should do alright.This is a bit late, but just curious;
I did Q28 "Analyse how macroeconomic policies can be used to achieve external stability in the Australian economy."
But only really focused on contractionary MP and FP, as they were the only ones which occurred to me would alleviate an issue of external instability, I felt like expansionary would probably make things worse due to Australia high income elasticity with imports etc. Do you think guys think that'll be okay or will the markers absolutely slam me?
You'll do fine and get a decent mark. It'd have been great to also talk about WHY expansionary would make things worse, and the slight positive benefits of expansionary policies as well, but what's done is done.This is a bit late, but just curious;
I did Q28 "Analyse how macroeconomic policies can be used to achieve external stability in the Australian economy."
But only really focused on contractionary MP and FP, as they were the only ones which occurred to me would alleviate an issue of external instability, I felt like expansionary would probably make things worse due to Australia high income elasticity with imports etc. Do you think guys think that'll be okay or will the markers absolutely slam me?