20 with "small to medium" handwriting will be more like 5000 lol, I wrote 5 pages with about 12-15 words per line which is approx 1k-1.1kand i wrote 4
wouldn't 20 be like 3000 words
20 with "small to medium" handwriting will be more like 5000 lol, I wrote 5 pages with about 12-15 words per line which is approx 1k-1.1kand i wrote 4
wouldn't 20 be like 3000 words
Calm down mate lolDude the international division of labour was fucking specialisation of labour you retards. It's about comparable advantage. I don't know what you guys are on about.
>inventing your own terminologyIt's about comparable advantage.
Sorta, but you didn't really need to cite specialisation of labour, so much as international division of labour which is precisely what the short answer question is asking. But dude:Dude the international division of labour was fucking specialisation of labour you retards. It's about comparable advantage. I don't know what you guys are on about.
I wrote comparative advantage in the exam. Just misspelled it here. lol. Specialisation of labour is one of the things you can mention. I wrote about a few shit.Sorta, but you didn't really need to cite specialisation of labour. But dude:
>says it's about comparable advantage
>doesn't realise such a term doesn't exist
>inb4 realises it's comparative
>inb4 realises his mistake and engages in philosophical rhetoric
lol
fair enough, but no need to vent it lolI wrote comparative advantage in the exam. Just misspelled it here. lol. Specialisation of labour is one of the things you can mention. I wrote about a few shit.
"yeah u like that u fuckin retard"Dude the international division of labour was fucking specialisation of labour you retards. It's about comparable advantage. I don't know what you guys are on about.
What did you write about? That seems well over 4000 words, so more than 2000 words per essay.17 on q25, 16 on q28
Was very happy, some interesting questions in there.
You use your knowledge of the philips curve and/or the short term inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation.How were we suppose to answer that NAIRU question? I didn't know what to write and only briefly knew what the NAIRU was.
Since the question asked for 'policy implications' I said that macro policies would not lower NAIRU, but only Micro doYou use your knowledge of the philips curve and/or the short term inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation.
sk i talked bout that tooSince the question asked for 'policy implications' I said that macro policies would not lower NAIRU, but only Micro do
me too, i said using macro policies only reduce u/e in the short term, but then just increase inflation. therefore mer msut be implemented blahSince the question asked for 'policy implications' I said that macro policies would not lower NAIRU, but only Micro do
Zzzz I think I woulda got 4/5 cos I didn't explain NAIRU.- because in my answer I assumed we all knew what NAIRU was. Stupid mistakes ffs.me too, i said using macro policies only reduce u/e in the short term, but then just increase inflation. therefore mer msut be implemented blah
This is correct. You had to state that macro policies would lead only to increased inflation and a short term decrease in unemployment whilst micro policies will bring down the structural level of unemploymentSince the question asked for 'policy implications' I said that macro policies would not lower NAIRU, but only Micro do