have u seen the first movie? now THAT is what I call crappy acting lolSpoRTsGaL said:Acting was average.
have u seen the first movie? now THAT is what I call crappy acting lolSpoRTsGaL said:Acting was average.
Serious ? I tought Emma Watson was easily the best in this film and she has easily been the best in all the others. She's got a future. Daniel Radcliffe is absolutely awful though........almost every scene of his was pretty close to dreadul.AlleyCat said:i was quite pleasantly surprised with harry as was i with the rest of the ensemble, all except that fucking twat hermione.
.
There was only like 3 scenes with Draco, the quidditch world cup, at school when he get humiliated and one more can't think of itSpoRTsGaL said:Oh, there wasn't enough of Draco. There should've been more of him. Even Neville made more of an appearance than Draco did.
Coincidentally, the guy who played Flitwick was the same guy who played the main goblin at Gringottsbubz :D said:i agree, why the hell did they change him from philosopher's stone? maybe it was because JKR commented that she imagined flitwick to be a normal human being, just very tiny - unlike what they did in PS, where he looked a mixture of goblin and human...
*cough cough splutter*bubz :D said:oh, and about emma watson - i actually liked her acting in the first one, she played hermione pretty damn well. but she's gone downhill since dan radcliffe is just getting better and better!
Yeah exactly, but unfortunately they didn't live up to expectations so Emma Watson was the drawcard againThe_highwayman said:But then again, they did have fleur and cho this time...hmmm.
agreed. they kidna stuck to the bushy hair thing in the first movie and it slowly got nicer...and nicer...and nicer til it was fit for a movie premiere red carpet walk. ackjebbie said:*cough cough splutter*
So I havent seen the new one, BUT OH MY GOODNESS EMMA WATSON COULDNT ACT IF HER LIFE DEPENDED ON IT.
Hermione is meant to be solely obsessed with books and nothing on appearances. I dont know HOW they do the transformation from feral to sheek because, although not sheek she definitely does not have buck teeth/feral hair/etc its just slightly teased. Grr
End of rant.
Yes. I was fuming.bubz :D said:i agree, in PS her hair was actually bushy and all she did was stalk around with a hunchback, carrying her books and being bossy...
and in the last couple of movies she's had nice wavy salon hair... remember how she goes "is that really how my hair looks from the back?" in the PoA movie? completely out of character.
Haha agreed with the last partSarah168 said:agreed. they kidna stuck to the bushy hair thing in the first movie and it slowly got nicer...and nicer...and nicer til it was fit for a movie premiere red carpet walk. ack