How accurate are SAM/UMAX? (1 Viewer)

[wsm991]

dude i need 95.3 to make commerce...fuck i prolly will scrape for a 95.. FUCK FML!!!

 

[boganxcore]

i have heard that matrix is most inaccurate calculator... so dont fret until tomorrow

 

[chopstick]

i got 94.00 in UMAX
and 81.95 in SAM
....
en...i think SAM is more accurate

 

[exiting]

Man you guys are fucked in the brain hahahahahaha. I'm happy wit an ESTIMATE on this UMAX of 93 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[57o1i]

SAM, JUAI and UMAX are all giving me exactly the same thing and I really bloody hope they're accurate. Fingers crossed.

 

[dirouj1]

yer me too im sooooooo stoked ay both SAM and UMAX estimated myn the same sooooo fingers crossed they are accurate cuz i sooooooooo want 96.5 ay yay!!

 

[wsm991]

Can some1 please tell me where to get JUAI or einstein.
Thanks

 

[Fortify]

I found that UMAX is a little bit higher than SAM.

 

[melissah182]

go kill urself fucking cunt

Thankyou! someone needed to say that your amazing

 

[wsm991]

hey rookie, where can u get einstein cacualtor from??

 

[roookie]

you can download it from here:

Atar calculator

best of luck

 

[Sarah92]

UMAX: 90.90 (ATAR)
SAM: 91.15 (UAI)
JUAI: 91.90 (UAI)
Einstein: 91.50 (ATAR)

I really hope they're accurate!

 

[possessionless]

sam gave me 91.9
matrix gave me 91.45

ahhhhhh please be true please please please!!

 

[HiddenDragon]

JUAI, Einstein, Sam and Umax give me around 96.00 to 96.50.

This is insane, i really, really hope this is real....

 

[wendybird]

um..question:

Which do you guys reckon is more accurate- SAM or Einstein?

SAM gave me a certain figure, Einstein gave me 0.05 less than that figure.

But SAM gave a LOWER aggregate and Einstein a HIGHER aggregate.

huh?

 

[57o1i]

um..question:

Which do you guys reckon is more accurate- SAM or Einstein?

SAM gave me a certain figure, Einstein gave me 0.05 less than that figure.

But SAM gave a LOWER aggregate and Einstein a HIGHER aggregate.

huh?

I echo that "huh?"

I haven't used Einstein so feel free to ignore, but do both programmes use data from the same year to make the estimates?

 

[alice09]

ok i hav a really dumb question: do we get an sms 2morrow of our atars or is access only through students online/phone call?

 

[wendybird]

well, Einstein 2009 gives 2 estimates:

1. UAI 2008
2. ATAR

And for the first figure, it was the same was SAM, but for the ATAR figure, it was reduced by 0.05.

I thought that in the pamphlet we got from BOS the ATARs trend at the top upwards? Not down?

Can someone whose probably read the pamphlet more carefully than I clarify whether say a predicted high 99s would actually go down (slightly) under ATAR?

That and the differing aggregates confuses me. I'm inclined to believe SAM because the high aggregates of Einstein sound fishy.

 

[jj.oc]

JUAI 99.90
UMAX 99.75
Einstein 99.70
SAM 99.65

hmm i wish they were more consistent

 

[nicola.jade.xx]

i know heaps of people who did their hsc last year and they all used umax and sam and both gave almost the same calculation which was only off their uai's by about 0.10 - 0.15 of mark.